{
  "id": 2971776,
  "name": "Ladislaw J. Tupy, Defendant in Error, v. Frank Cech and Anna Cech, Plaintiffs in Error",
  "name_abbreviation": "Tupy v. Cech",
  "decision_date": "1916-05-29",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 22,100",
  "first_page": "496",
  "last_page": "497",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "199 Ill. App. 496"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 125,
    "char_count": 1440,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.55,
    "sha256": "8aecb6e1fed048afd368e040fc85364552550647e5ecdbf957979147ff37a16e",
    "simhash": "1:c846e0afa08dc0ab",
    "word_count": 241
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:51:30.955611+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Ladislaw J. Tupy, Defendant in Error, v. Frank Cech and Anna Cech, Plaintiffs in Error."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Baker\ndelivered .the opinion of the court.\nAbstract of the Decision.\n1. Brokers, \u00a7 93 \u2014when existence of contract of employment for jury. In an action for commissions for the sale of real estate, question whether the plaintiff had established a contract of employment by the defendants held for the jury, and on the evidence conclusive on appeal.\n2. Witnesses, \u00a7 253*\u2014when credibility of for jury. Credibility of witnesses is a question for the jury.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Baker"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Joseph Z. Klenha and Joseph J. Kroupa, for plaintiffs in error.",
      "Newman, Poppenhusen & Stern, for defendant in error; Charles T. Farson, of counsel."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Ladislaw J. Tupy, Defendant in Error, v. Frank Cech and Anna Cech, Plaintiffs in Error.\nGen. No. 22,100.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nError to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Hosea W. Wells, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the March term, 1916.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed May 29, 1916.\nStatement of the Case.\nAction by Ladislaw J. Tupy, plaintiff, against Frank Cech and Anna Cech, defendants, to recover commissions for the sale of real estate. To reverse a judgment of nil capiat, plaintiff prosecutes a writ of error.\nPlaintiff was corroborated in his testimony by the testimony of Joseph and Mary Kolar, \"the purchasers of the real estate, and was contradicted only by the testimony of Frank and Anna Cech.\nJoseph Z. Klenha and Joseph J. Kroupa, for plaintiffs in error.\nNewman, Poppenhusen & Stern, for defendant in error; Charles T. Farson, of counsel.\nSee Illinois NotJts Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section .number."
  },
  "file_name": "0496-01",
  "first_page_order": 518,
  "last_page_order": 519
}