{
  "id": 2972732,
  "name": "Henry M. Lauderdale and Harry H. Lauderdale, trading as Lauderdale & Son, Defendants in Error, v. William Downs, Plaintiff in Error",
  "name_abbreviation": "Lauderdale v. Downs",
  "decision_date": "1916-06-19",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 22,171",
  "first_page": "563",
  "last_page": "564",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "199 Ill. App. 563"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 161,
    "char_count": 2017,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.571,
    "sha256": "a29cc12d12a84e0811a7dbedbc3c48c4dfcbd9340eb05981646c53b321e41feb",
    "simhash": "1:6fdec898130bdbfa",
    "word_count": 338
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:51:30.955611+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Henry M. Lauderdale and Harry H. Lauderdale, trading as Lauderdale & Son, Defendants in Error, v. William Downs, Plaintiff in Error."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Presiding Justice McSurely\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Presiding Justice McSurely"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Henry L. Wilson, for plaintiff in error; F. P. Bead, of counsel.",
      "Oliver B. Opsahl, for defendants in error."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Henry M. Lauderdale and Harry H. Lauderdale, trading as Lauderdale & Son, Defendants in Error, v. William Downs, Plaintiff in Error.\nGen. No. 22,171.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nError to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Frank H. Graham, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the March term, 1916.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed June 19, 1916.\nStatement of the Case.\nAction by Henry M. Lauderdale and Harry H. Lauderdale, trading as Lauderdale & Son, plaintiffs, against William Downs, defendant, for commissions for the sale of real estate. To reverse a judgment for plaintiffs, defendant prosecutes a writ of error.\nIn June, 1915, defendant engaged the plaintiffs, who are licensed real estate brokers, to sell a piece of real estate belonging to him; the defendant agreed to sell the property at a price of $5,250, and to pay the plaintiffs the Chicago Beal Estate Board rate commissions, and the property was listed with plaintiffs upon these terms. The plaintiffs submitted the property to Paul B. Scholz, and at the same time informed defendant that Scholz was the 'buyer secured by them. Scholz made the brokers and also the defendant an offer on the property, and after defendant had raised his price several times the defendant and the buyer came to terms, and in August, 1915, the property was conveyed to Scholz.\nAbstract of the Decision.\nBrokers, \u00a7 48 \u2014when entitled to commissions upon furnishing purchaser. A broker, who, in pursuanc\u00e9 of an agreement with the owner of real estate to sell the property for him, furnishes a purchaser ready, willing and able to buy it and who through direct negotiations with the owner does buy it at a price higher than that named to the broker, is entitled to the commissions agreed upon.\nHenry L. Wilson, for plaintiff in error; F. P. Bead, of counsel.\nOliver B. Opsahl, for defendants in error.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0563-01",
  "first_page_order": 585,
  "last_page_order": 586
}