{
  "id": 2975501,
  "name": "Norman Johnson, Defendant in Error, v. Susan Dellas and Anton J. Cermak, Bailiff, Plaintiffs in Error",
  "name_abbreviation": "Johnson v. Dellas",
  "decision_date": "1916-06-19",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 22,114",
  "first_page": "576",
  "last_page": "577",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "199 Ill. App. 576"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 148,
    "char_count": 1655,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.605,
    "sha256": "f9067b01ed2f0f2659203651bd72b2c71bde8d91585b04de3d18b03957a1a8b8",
    "simhash": "1:395fc031c0ae2edd",
    "word_count": 284
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:51:30.955611+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Norman Johnson, Defendant in Error, v. Susan Dellas and Anton J. Cermak, Bailiff, Plaintiffs in Error."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Holdom\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Holdom"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Peden, Kahn & Murphy, for plaintiffs in error; Harry Kahn, of counsel.",
      "No appearance for defendant in error."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Norman Johnson, Defendant in Error, v. Susan Dellas and Anton J. Cermak, Bailiff, Plaintiffs in Error.\nGen. No. 22,114.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nError to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Hugh J. Kearns, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the March term, 1916.\nReversed with directions.\nOpinion filed June 19, 1916.\nStatement of the Case.\nAction by Norman Johnson, plaintiff, against Susan Dellas and Anton J. Cermak, bailiff of the Municipal Court of Chicago, defendants, to try the right to property taken under execution. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendants bring error.\nAbstract of the Decision.\n1. Execution, \u00a7 84 \u2014when statute requiring service of copy of writ of execution upon debtor complied with. The purpose of Hurd\u2019s Rev. St. ch. 52, sec. 14 (J. & A. If 5584), providing that a copy of a writ of. execution shall be served upon the debtor in the same manner as summonses are served in chancery, is to give the debtor an opportunity to make a schedule and claim exemption within ten days, and the purpose of the statute is met when the debtor in fact sends his schedule to the bailiff in due time, although service is made upon the wife of the debtor.\n2. Exemptions, \u00a7 28*\u2014when unsworn schedule insufficient. An unsworn schedule of property claimed to be exempt is insufficient and not in compliance with Hurd\u2019s Rev. St. ch. 52, sec. 14 (J. & A. If 5584).\nPeden, Kahn & Murphy, for plaintiffs in error; Harry Kahn, of counsel.\nNo appearance for defendant in error.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same tonic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0576-01",
  "first_page_order": 598,
  "last_page_order": 599
}