{
  "id": 2973283,
  "name": "Frank Zurek and Martin Wierbowski, Defendants in Error, v. Joseph Ferfecki and Regina Ferfecki, Plaintiffs in Error",
  "name_abbreviation": "Zurek v. Ferfecki",
  "decision_date": "1916-06-19",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 22,191",
  "first_page": "587",
  "last_page": "588",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "199 Ill. App. 587"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 108,
    "char_count": 1316,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.543,
    "sha256": "8d4aa49c992d5abd4d6b15aaa2896bb5d2d9e8ae588024c36632d548799a49e8",
    "simhash": "1:2bc3504a484a5ace",
    "word_count": 211
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:51:30.955611+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Frank Zurek and Martin Wierbowski, Defendants in Error, v. Joseph Ferfecki and Regina Ferfecki, Plaintiffs in Error."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Holdom\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Holdom"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Thomas E. Swanson, for plaintiffs in error.",
      "Bernard J. Brown, for defendants in error."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Frank Zurek and Martin Wierbowski, Defendants in Error, v. Joseph Ferfecki and Regina Ferfecki, Plaintiffs in Error.\nGen. No. 22,191.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nError to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. John R. Newcomer, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the March term, 1916.\nReversed without remanding.\nOpinion filed June 19, 1916.\nStatement of the Case.\nAction by Frank Zurek and Martin Wierbowski, plaintiffs, against Joseph Ferfecki and Regina Ferfecki, defendants, to recover commissions under a contract for the exchange of real estate between defendants and others. From a judgment for plaintiffs, defendants prosecute a writ of error.\nThomas E. Swanson, for plaintiffs in error.\nAbstract of the Decision.\nBrokers\u2014when verdict should be directed for defendants in action for commissions. In an action by a broker to recover a stipulated commission for the exchange of real estate between defendants and others where there was no testimony to contradict evidence in behalf of defendants that the agreement was that no commission should be paid unless the deal was closed, and it was admitted that the deal was never carried out, held that a verdict for defendants should have been instructed.\nBernard J. Brown, for defendants in error."
  },
  "file_name": "0587-01",
  "first_page_order": 609,
  "last_page_order": 610
}