{
  "id": 4788527,
  "name": "James McCoy et al. v. John W Schnellbacker",
  "name_abbreviation": "McCoy v. Schnellbacker",
  "decision_date": "1878-05",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "582",
  "last_page": "582",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "2 Ill. App. 582"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "82 Ill. 157",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        5314749
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/82/0157-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "16 Ill. 114",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        2588342
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/16/0114-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "11 Ill. 511",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        2577317
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/11/0511-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 113,
    "char_count": 1498,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.452,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.1536132029319084
    },
    "sha256": "2db241046f05d52a0ea024a12d42c0b3ff215ebe666f0bc60be6fc2e77f394f7",
    "simhash": "1:8ac4e5994e32bc41",
    "word_count": 254
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:23:02.092512+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "James McCoy et al. v. John W Schnellbacker."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nThe 37th Sec. of the Act of 1874, provides, sec. 37: \u201cAll judgments in attachment against the same defendant, returnable at the same term, and all judgments in suits by summons, capias or attachment against such defendant recovered at that term or at the term when the judgment in the first attachment upon which judgment shall be recovered is rendered, shall share pro rata according to the amount of the several judgments in the proceeds of the property attached, either in the hands of a garnishee or otherwise.\u201d In this case all the judgments were rendered at the same time, it being the term at which the judgments were rendered and the first attachment issued, and by the plain provisions of this section, all are to share pro rata in the proceeds of the property attached.\nJudgment affirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Messrs. Roberts & Green, for plaintiffs in error;"
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "James McCoy et al. v. John W Schnellbacker.\nAttachment\u2014Division of proceeds.\u2014All judgments in attachment against the same defendant, returnable at the same term, and all judgments recovered at that term, or at the term when the judgment in the first attachment shall be rendered,\" are entitled to share pro rata in the proceeds of the property attached.\nError to the Circuit Court of Tazewell county; the'Hon. John Burns, Judge, presiding.\nMessrs. Roberts & Green, for plaintiffs in error;\nthat a division of proceeds should have been made, cited Rev. Stat. 1874, 744; Stahl v. Webster, 11 Ill. 511; Warren v. Iscarian Community, 16 Ill. 114; Merchants Sav. Inst. v. Given, 82 Ill. 157."
  },
  "file_name": "0582-01",
  "first_page_order": 578,
  "last_page_order": 578
}