{
  "id": 4788240,
  "name": "The Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Company v. Frank W. Van Hagen",
  "name_abbreviation": "Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. Van Hagen",
  "decision_date": "1878-05",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "602",
  "last_page": "602",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "2 Ill. App. 602"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 54,
    "char_count": 439,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.496,
    "sha256": "c122953338a49847d30ec97cd97f9f9ce471b28039cd506a169c12219b30b1b5",
    "simhash": "1:ebcf711c6929349d",
    "word_count": 72
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:23:02.092512+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "The Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Company v. Frank W. Van Hagen."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Davis, J.\nThe evidence in-this case is substantially the same as in the case of the Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Company v. Simon E. Clark {ante y>.596], decided at the present term, and the decision must be the same.\nJudgment reversed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Davis, J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Mr. O. H. Browning, for appellant.",
      "Messrs. Wheat & Bonnet, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "The Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Company v. Frank W. Van Hagen.\nAppeal from the Circuit Court of Adams county.\nMr. O. H. Browning, for appellant.\nMessrs. Wheat & Bonnet, for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0602-01",
  "first_page_order": 598,
  "last_page_order": 598
}