{
  "id": 5415784,
  "name": "James J. Ryan, Appellee, v. Chicago Foundry Company, Appellant",
  "name_abbreviation": "Ryan v. Chicago Foundry Co.",
  "decision_date": "1916-07-20",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 21,398",
  "first_page": "45",
  "last_page": "46",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "200 Ill. App. 45"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 146,
    "char_count": 1928,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.587,
    "sha256": "ab5a06df32d12c0e6ce7427024c5c8ff58c5b556f2e0899c6813546df1d1a002",
    "simhash": "1:d2759f265866a257",
    "word_count": 315
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:50:22.374886+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "James J. Ryan, Appellee, v. Chicago Foundry Company, Appellant."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Presiding Justice Barnes\ndelivered the opinion of the court.\n2. Courts, \u00a7 100 \u2014when County Court has jurisdiction of assumpsit on award. The County Court has jurisdiction of a suit in assumpsit based on an award for less than $1,000.\n3. Assumpsit, action of, \u00a7 6 \u2014when proper remedy on an award. Assumpsit is a proper remedy on an award.\n4. Workmen\u2019s Compensation Act\u2014when evidence as to liability of employer properly excluded in assumpsit on award. In a suit in assumpsit based on an award made under the Workmen\u2019s Compensation Act (J. & A. 1[ 5449 et seq.), evidence bearing on the question of defendant\u2019s liability under such act is properly excluded as irrelevant.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Presiding Justice Barnes"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Eastman & White, for appellant.",
      "Gorman, Pollock, Sullivan & Livingston, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "James J. Ryan, Appellee, v. Chicago Foundry Company, Appellant.\nGen. No. 21,398.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nAbstract of the Decision.\n1. Workmen\u2019s Compensation Act\u2014when award signed by two of three arbitrators sufficient. Under section 10 of the Workmen\u2019s Compensation Act (J. & A. T 5459), and section 1 of the act as to statutory construction (J. & A. f 11102), an award of the arbitrators which is signed by only two of the three arbitrators appointed under the Workmen\u2019s Compensation Act is valid.\nAppeal from the County Court of Cook county; the Hon. J. J. Cooke, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the March .term, 1915.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed July 20, 1916.\nStatement of the Case.\nAssumpsit by James J. Ryan, plaintiff, against Chicago Foundry Company, a corporation, defendant, based upon an award made for plaintiff against defendant under the Workman\u2019s Compensation Act of 1911 (J. & A. ti 5449 et seq.), which was signed by only two of the three arbitrators appointed thereunder. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.\nEastman & White, for appellant.\nGorman, Pollock, Sullivan & Livingston, for appellee.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section nutnber."
  },
  "file_name": "0045-01",
  "first_page_order": 67,
  "last_page_order": 68
}