{
  "id": 5417444,
  "name": "Evalyn Kingman, Appellee, v. Louis Kingman, Appellant",
  "name_abbreviation": "Kingman v. Kingman",
  "decision_date": "1916-04-14",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 6,178",
  "first_page": "338",
  "last_page": "338",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "200 Ill. App. 338"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 149,
    "char_count": 1528,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.578,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 5.502782566481379e-08,
      "percentile": 0.34418454512212876
    },
    "sha256": "88c814ef12f5ab5dd84ccef22f42318eb6b80d732847f5d2b1c3865a8703a082",
    "simhash": "1:47d3cbfcd8830c98",
    "word_count": 254
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:50:22.374886+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Evalyn Kingman, Appellee, v. Louis Kingman, Appellant."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Carnes\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Carnes"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Evans & Evans, for appellant.",
      "Robert H. Lovett and Weil & Bartley, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Evalyn Kingman, Appellee, v. Louis Kingman, Appellant.\nGen. No. 6,178.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nAbstract of the Decision.\n1. Divobce, \u00a7 109 \u2014what orders relative to. alimony may he made. The court may, from time to time, make such orders as to the amount of alimony that shall be paid as the exigencies of the \u2022 case require.\n2. Divobce, \u00a7 110*\u2014when amount of alimony properly reduced. Where, owing to financial reverses, the defendant\u2019s income had been very much reduced, alimony was reduced from $20 to $5 per week, and an order committing him for contempt for not paying alimony past due, reversed.\n3. Divorce, \u00a7 110*\u2014when refusal to reduce alimony erroneous. Refusal of the court to reduce alimony because the defendant was in contempt for failure to pay alimony past due, held error.\nAppeal from the Circuit Court of Peoria county; the Hon. Theodobe N. Green, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1915.\nReversed and remanded with directions.\nOpinion filed April 14, 1916.\nStatement of the Case.\nPetition filed by Evalyn Kingman, petitioner, against Lonis Kingman, respondent, asking for a rule to show cause why the respondent should not be \u25a0 attacked for contempt of court for refusal to pay alimony. From an order entered against him, the defendant appeals.\nEvans & Evans, for appellant.\nRobert H. Lovett and Weil & Bartley, for appellee.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0338-01",
  "first_page_order": 360,
  "last_page_order": 360
}