#### City of Chicago, Defendant in Error, v. Frank Walker, alias Clark, Plaintiff in Error.

Gen. No. 21,509.

(Not to be reported in full.)

Abstract of the Decision.

Appeal and error, § 1751 * —when judgment affirmed. Where a defendant sought to reverse a judgment against him on the ground that the trial court erroneously denied his petition for a change of venue, held that the petition not having been preserved by certificate of evidence or bill of exceptions, the judgment must be affirmed.

Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon.- John A. Ma-honey, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the October term, 1915.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed October 10, 1916.

Statement of the Case.

Prosecution by the City of Chicago, plaintiff, against Frank Walker, alias Clark, defendant. To review a judgment entered gainst the defendant, he prosecutes a writ of error.

Cantwell & Smith, for plaintiff in error.

Samuel A. Ettelson and Harry B. Miller, for defendant in error; Daniel Webster, of counsel.

*

See Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number.

Mr. Justice McGoorty

delivered the opinion of the court.