{
  "id": 2968409,
  "name": "Minnie Schoenle, Plaintiff in Error, v. Great Eastern Casualty Company, Defendant in Error",
  "name_abbreviation": "Schoenle v. Great Eastern Casualty Co.",
  "decision_date": "1915-10-13",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "5",
  "last_page": "6",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "201 Ill. App. 5"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 161,
    "char_count": 2369,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.56,
    "sha256": "3dc972b6ce00594757d855eabb278c87a7767a1f0365428b9590819c9d228e62",
    "simhash": "1:5a07a2b5181f20b4",
    "word_count": 395
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:52:04.845486+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Minnie Schoenle, Plaintiff in Error, v. Great Eastern Casualty Company, Defendant in Error."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Graves\ndelivered the opinion of the court.\n3. Insurance\u2014when knowledge by agent of facts concerning applicant which are ground for forfeiture question for jury. In an action on. an accident insurance policy, held a question for the jury whether the agent knew facts concerning the applicant at the time of issuance of the policy which, had he not known them, would 'have been ground for forfeiture.\n4. Insurance, \u00a7 686 \u2014when manner of death of insured question for jury. In an action on an accident insurance policy, the question whether the insured was a temperate man and met his death by accident or as a result of alcoholism, held for the jury, the evidence being conflicting.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Graves"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Andrus & Trutter, for plaintiff in error.",
      "T. J. Sullivan, for defendant in error."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Minnie Schoenle, Plaintiff in Error, v. Great Eastern Casualty Company, Defendant in Error.\n(Not to he reported in full.)\nAbstract of the Decision.\n1. Insurance, \u00a7 122 \u2014when application not part of accident pot-icy. An application for an accident insurance policy, held not to have been made a part of a .policy stating that such application had been made a part thereof by indorsement thereon of a copy of such application, where such copy differed materially, as to facts stated, from the original application.\n2. Insurance, \u00a7 331*\u2014when insurer may not forfeit policy. An insurance company cannot forfeit a policy for causes known to the agent at the time he issued it.\nError to the County Court of Sangamon county; the Hon. Charles J. Gehlbach, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1914.\nReversed and remanded.\nOpinion filed October 13, 1915.\nStatement of the Case.\nAction under an accident insurance policy by Minnie Schoenle, plaintiff, against the Great Eastern Casualty Company, defendant, for death of the insured. To review a judgment against her, the plaintiff prosecutes a writ of error.\nThe defendant company\u2019s agent knew at the time of the issuance of the policy and making of the application that a policy formerly held by the applicant in another company had been canceled, which fact the applicant failed to mention in the proper space in the application.\nAndrus & Trutter, for plaintiff in error.\nT. J. Sullivan, for defendant in error.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0005-01",
  "first_page_order": 47,
  "last_page_order": 48
}