{
  "id": 2962773,
  "name": "J. C. Graff and John Schultz, trading as J. C. Graff & Company, Defendants in Error, v. George Moench, Plaintiff in Error",
  "name_abbreviation": "Graff v. Moench",
  "decision_date": "1916-04-21",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "140",
  "last_page": "141",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "201 Ill. App. 140"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "181 Ill. App. 127",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        880226
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app/181/0127-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 153,
    "char_count": 1880,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.594,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 6.770845263994211e-08,
      "percentile": 0.41218445554161653
    },
    "sha256": "503936b381e1e220196a11e1e0536b8ce26f6003e912253d8b5d5707c6bef910",
    "simhash": "1:db5fdf043a2f30f9",
    "word_count": 316
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:52:04.845486+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "J. C. Graff and John Schultz, trading as J. C. Graff & Company, Defendants in Error, v. George Moench, Plaintiff in Error."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Presiding Justice Eldredge\ndelivered the opinion of the court.\n2. Trial, \u00a7 204*\u2014when refusal to direct verdict is error.' In an action of assumpsit, covering several items, the refusal of the trial court to direct, at the defendant\u2019s request, a verdict against him on a certain item for which the evidence showed him liable, held error.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Presiding Justice Eldredge"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "B. O. Willard and L. A. Jarman, for plaintiff in error.",
      "Glass & Bottenberg and Chiperfield & Chiperfield, for defendants in error."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "J. C. Graff and John Schultz, trading as J. C. Graff & Company, Defendants in Error, v. George Moench, Plaintiff in Error.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nAbstract of the Decision.\n1. Gaming, \u00a7 43 \u2014when evidence sufficient to show that transactions are of gambling nature. In an action to recover a balance alleged to be due the plaintiffs on account of transactions made on the Chicago Board of Trade, held that the evidence showed that such transactions were gambling transactions, and that a verdict for the plaintiff was clearly and manifestly contrary to the weight of the evidence.\nError to the Circuit Court of Schuyler county; the Hon. Gut R. Wiliuams, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1915.\nReversed and remanded.\nOpinion filed April 21, 1916.\nStatement of the Case.\nAssumpsit by J. C. Graff and John Schultz, trading as J. C. Graff & Company, plaintiffs, against George Moench, defendant. To review a judgment for plaintiffs, defendant prosecutes a writ of error.\nThe action was to recover an alleged balance due on account of deals transacted on the Board of Trade of Chicago and some items of merchandise sold and delivered by the plaintiff to the defendant. The evidence heard was substantially the same as appeared in the record on a former appeal, 181 Ill. App. 127.\nB. O. Willard and L. A. Jarman, for plaintiff in error.\nGlass & Bottenberg and Chiperfield & Chiperfield, for defendants in error.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number. \u201e"
  },
  "file_name": "0140-01",
  "first_page_order": 182,
  "last_page_order": 183
}