{
  "id": 2966067,
  "name": "Jacob Cohn, trading as Chicago Bonnet & Hat Frame Company, Appellee, v. Carlowitz & Company, Appellants",
  "name_abbreviation": "Cohn v. Carlowitz & Co.",
  "decision_date": "1916-10-10",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 21,367",
  "first_page": "443",
  "last_page": "444",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "201 Ill. App. 443"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 119,
    "char_count": 1373,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.558,
    "sha256": "1ac56f7284fac3dcff215a396111cb62f11c92ee6d789860f3d025ef1f00292f",
    "simhash": "1:c1134a0d542d0290",
    "word_count": 214
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:52:04.845486+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Jacob Cohn, trading as Chicago Bonnet & Hat Frame Company, Appellee, v. Carlowitz & Company, Appellants."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Presiding Justice Barnes delivered\nthe opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Presiding Justice Barnes delivered"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Ernest R. Finer, for appellants; Jennings & Finer, of counsel.",
      "Pines & Newmann, for appellee; Robert S. Kolliner, of counsel."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Jacob Cohn, trading as Chicago Bonnet & Hat Frame Company, Appellee, v. Carlowitz & Company, Appellants.\nGen. No. 21,367.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nAppeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Hosea W. Wells, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the March term, 1915.\nReversed with finding of fact.\nOpinion filed October 10, 1916.\nStatement of the Case.\nAction by Jacob Cohn, trading as Chicago Bonnet & Hat Frame Company, plaintiff, against Carlowitz & Company, a copartnership, defendants, to recover damages for nondelivery of goods under an alleged contract of sale. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendants appeal.\nAbstract of the Decision.\nSales, \u00a7 1 \u2014when evidence insufficient to show contract of sale. In an action for damages for nondelivery of goods to the plaintiff under an alleged contract of sale executed by the defendants, evidence held to show that the plaintiff\u2019s order was not accepted by the defendants and the defendants\u2019 counter proposition was not accepted by the plaintiff, and that no contract existed between the parties.\nErnest R. Finer, for appellants; Jennings & Finer, of counsel.\nPines & Newmann, for appellee; Robert S. Kolliner, of counsel.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0443-01",
  "first_page_order": 485,
  "last_page_order": 486
}