{
  "id": 2967553,
  "name": "Albert Fuchs, Defendant in Error, v. W. J. Kearns, Plaintiff in Error",
  "name_abbreviation": "Fuchs v. Kearns",
  "decision_date": "1916-10-10",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 21,607",
  "first_page": "458",
  "last_page": "459",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "201 Ill. App. 458"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 163,
    "char_count": 1726,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.577,
    "sha256": "7844490468c7d6ca32b842ea6a5819a331c320379be6dc59bc2a1c020547e076",
    "simhash": "1:8975e305700931ac",
    "word_count": 291
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:52:04.845486+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Albert Fuchs, Defendant in Error, v. W. J. Kearns, Plaintiff in Error."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Presiding Justice Barnes\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Presiding Justice Barnes"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "E. C. Mapledoram, for plaintiff in error.",
      "John H. Cummings, Jr., for defendant in error."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Albert Fuchs, Defendant in Error, v. W. J. Kearns, Plaintiff in Error.\nGen. No. 21,607.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nError to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Patrick B. Flanagan, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the October term, 1915.\nReversed with finding of fact.\nOpinion filed October 10, 1916.\nStatement of the Case.\nAction by Albert Fuchs, plaintiff, against W. J. Kearns, defendant, for rent of an apartment leased by the defendant to the plaintiff. To review a judgment for plaintiff, defendant prosecutes a writ of error.\nE. C. Mapledoram, for plaintiff in error.\nJohn H. Cummings, Jr., for defendant in error.\nAbstract of the Decision.\n1. Judgment, \u00a7 205 \u2014When court may not render a compromise judgment. A trial court cannot render a compromise judgment which the parties will not accept if the evidence introduced will not support it.\n2. Landlord and tenant, \u00a7 79*\u2014when tease deemed to have been terminated. Where the lessee of an apartment, holding under a lease containing the following clause: \u201cCancellation privilege granted September 30, 1914, if a registered letter notice is given by August 15, 1914, and $30 paid extra,\u201d gave notice as required on August 7, 1914, and sent to the plaintiff a check for $30 which was received by him on September 28th, and retained by him, though not cashed, and delivered the keys to the lessor on September 25th and moved from the apartment, and the lessor placed rent signs in the windows of the apartment, held that the lease was terminated in accordance with its terms.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0458-01",
  "first_page_order": 500,
  "last_page_order": 501
}