{
  "id": 2966266,
  "name": "Patrick Brennan, Defendant in Error, v. Ideal Heating Company, Plaintiff in Error",
  "name_abbreviation": "Brennan v. Ideal Heating Co.",
  "decision_date": "1916-10-10",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 21,443",
  "first_page": "469",
  "last_page": "469",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "201 Ill. App. 469"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 123,
    "char_count": 1517,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.531,
    "sha256": "bff1b7e8ad214081e2987d8ebfdafe41c32fe6f7ff944c4445233a71d806f139",
    "simhash": "1:07110215504bc2b8",
    "word_count": 252
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:52:04.845486+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Patrick Brennan, Defendant in Error, v. Ideal Heating Company, Plaintiff in Error."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice McDonald\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice McDonald"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Benson & Fitch, for plaintiff in error.",
      "Henry M. Hagan, for defendant in error."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Patrick Brennan, Defendant in Error, v. Ideal Heating Company, Plaintiff in Error.\nGen. No. 21,443.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nAbstract of the Decision.\nAppeal and error, \u00a7 1803 \u2014when judgment must he reversed and remanded for a new trial. Where, in an action, for labor and materials furnished by the plaintiff in making alterations and additions to a hot water heating plant installed by the defendant, the evidence showed merely the value in gross of the various items, some of which were improperly included in the claim, held that a judgment for the plaintiff must he reversed and the cause remanded for a new trial, as the value of such items, not being known, could not he deducted from a judgment.\nError to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Percy L. Persons, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the October term, 1915.,\nReversed and remanded.\nOpinion filed October 10, 1916.\nStatement of the Case.\nAction by Patrick Brennan, plaintiff, against the Ideal Heating Company, a corporation, defendant, for the value of labor and materials used by the plaintiff in making alterations and additions to a hot water heating plant installed for the plaintiff by the defendant. To review a judgment for plaintiff, defendant prosecutes a writ of error.\nBenson & Fitch, for plaintiff in error.\nHenry M. Hagan, for defendant in error.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0469-01",
  "first_page_order": 511,
  "last_page_order": 511
}