{
  "id": 2967763,
  "name": "New City Produce Company, Defendant in Error, v. R. W. Wall, Plaintiff in Error",
  "name_abbreviation": "New City Produce Co. v. Wall",
  "decision_date": "1916-10-10",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 21,545",
  "first_page": "473",
  "last_page": "473",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "201 Ill. App. 473"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 143,
    "char_count": 1740,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.568,
    "sha256": "61ccbf9fc38cd498b0b71571f46f4a3e0db54f3d021ee2652d737c18972f6984",
    "simhash": "1:8d5b8c255046189d",
    "word_count": 290
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:52:04.845486+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "New City Produce Company, Defendant in Error, v. R. W. Wall, Plaintiff in Error."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice McDonald\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice McDonald"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Henry Knaus, for plaintiff in error.",
      "Brown, Brown & Brown, for defendant in error."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "New City Produce Company, Defendant in Error, v. R. W. Wall, Plaintiff in Error.\nGen. No. 21,545.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nAbstract of the Decision.\nMunicipal Court of Chicago, \u00a7 29 \u2014when presumed that trial court heard sufficient evidence to determine existence of irregularities in lease. Where a judgment for rent was entered by confession under a lease alleged to have been executed by the plaintiff to the defendant, held that in the absence of a hill of exceptions, the trial court having found that a statement of claim and warrant of attorney and a lease and cognovit had been filed, the appearance of the defendant entered and the amount due on the lease confessed, it must he presumed that the court also heard sufficient evidence to correctly determine whether or not any irregularity existed, though in the, body of the lease, which was executed by the plaintiff by its president and by the defendant, the president was named as the lessor and no mention was made of the lessee\u2019s name.\nError to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. John A. Mahoney, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the October term, 1915. Petition for certiorari dismissed.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed October 10, 1916.\nStatement of the Case.\nAction by the New City Produce Company, a corporation, plaintiff, against R. W. Wall, defendant, for rent under a lease of the plaintiff\u2019s premises executed by the defendant. To review a judgment for plaintiff, defendant prosecutes a writ of error.\nHenry Knaus, for plaintiff in error.\nBrown, Brown & Brown, for defendant in error.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0473-01",
  "first_page_order": 515,
  "last_page_order": 515
}