{
  "id": 2960623,
  "name": "Catharyn Wilson, Executrix, Defendant in Error, v. F. Norwood Wilson, Plaintiff in Error",
  "name_abbreviation": "Wilson v. Wilson",
  "decision_date": "1916-10-10",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 21,586",
  "first_page": "478",
  "last_page": "479",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "201 Ill. App. 478"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 113,
    "char_count": 1250,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.571,
    "sha256": "5f2b5c37ff1e7303569cf96f42fd3423a832f0896886ec33d917a9ca8293fe3a",
    "simhash": "1:15580924502ca11c",
    "word_count": 207
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:52:04.845486+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Catharyn Wilson, Executrix, Defendant in Error, v. F. Norwood Wilson, Plaintiff in Error."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mb. Justice McDonald\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mb. Justice McDonald"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "James A. Wagoner, for plaintiff in error.",
      "Culver, Andrews, King & Cook, for defendant in error."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Catharyn Wilson, Executrix, Defendant in Error, v. F. Norwood Wilson, Plaintiff in Error.\nGen. No. 21,586.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nError to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Habby M. Pisheb, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the October term, 1915.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed October 10, 1916.\nStatement of the Case.\nAction by Catharyn Wilson, executrix of the estate of Thomas S. Wilson, deceased, plaintiff, against F. Norwood Wilson, defendant, on a promissory note alleged to have been made by the defendant. To review a judgment for plaintiff, defendant prosecutes a writ of error.\nAbstract of the, Decision.\n1. Bills and notes, \u00a7 407 \u2014when burden of proof is on defendant. In an action on a promissory note, held that the burden of proving the defense of failure of consideration was on the defendant.\n2. Bills and notes, \u00a7 461*\u2014when verdict properly directed. Evidence in an action on a promissory note held to justify a directed verdict for the plaintiff.\nJames A. Wagoner, for plaintiff in error.\nCulver, Andrews, King & Cook, for defendant in error.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and Section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0478-01",
  "first_page_order": 520,
  "last_page_order": 521
}