{
  "id": 2969119,
  "name": "Arthur J. Dunbar, Defendant in Error, v. Alexander Eisenstein and Samuel Isenstein, copartners, trading as Eisenstein & Isenstein, Plaintiffs in Error",
  "name_abbreviation": "Dunbar v. Eisenstein",
  "decision_date": "1916-10-10",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 21,737",
  "first_page": "487",
  "last_page": "488",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "201 Ill. App. 487"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 135,
    "char_count": 1785,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.549,
    "sha256": "7100314071e7d0dfa6d01ffdc2524be25746d0a8fbcf65ee664693d153d11aef",
    "simhash": "1:067d5504760fa4cc",
    "word_count": 287
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:52:04.845486+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Arthur J. Dunbar, Defendant in Error, v. Alexander Eisenstein and Samuel Isenstein, copartners, trading as Eisenstein & Isenstein, Plaintiffs in Error."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice McDonald\ndelivered the opinion of the court.\nAbstract of the Decision.\n1. Appeal and error, \u00a7 1752 \u2014when judgment affirmed. Where the trial court refused to allow the defendants\u2019 counterclaim for rent alleged to be due them from the plaintiff under a lease, which the defendants did not set up in their abstract of record on appeal, a judgment for the plaintiff was affirmed, the court holding that it would not go to the record to correct an abstract or to supply omissions in order to reverse a judgment.\n2. Set-off and recoupment, \u00a7 40*\u2014when evidence sufficient to sustain disallowance of counterclaim. Evidence in an action for goods sold and delivered by the plaintiff to the defendants, wherein the defendants sought to counterclaim for rent alleged to be due them from the plaintiff under a lease, held to justify a judgment for the plaintiff and a disallowance of the counterclaim.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice McDonald"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Max M. Korshak, for plaintiffs in error.",
      "McMahon & Graber, for defendant in error."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Arthur J. Dunbar, Defendant in Error, v. Alexander Eisenstein and Samuel Isenstein, copartners, trading as Eisenstein & Isenstein, Plaintiffs in Error.\nGen. No. 21,737.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nError to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Shebidan E. Pbt, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the October term, 1915.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed October 10, 1916.\nStatement of the Case.\nAction by Arthur J. Dunbar, plaintiff, against Alexander Eisenstein and Samuel Isenstein, copartners, trading as Eisenstein & Isenstein, defendants, for goods sold and delivered by the plaintiff to the defendants. To review a judgment for plaintiff, defendants prosecute a writ of error.\nMax M. Korshak, for plaintiffs in error.\nMcMahon & Graber, for defendant in error.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0487-01",
  "first_page_order": 529,
  "last_page_order": 530
}