{
  "id": 2967076,
  "name": "Joseph Kaufman and William Bernstein, trading as Joseph Kaufman & Company, Plaintiffs in Error, v. Chicago, Indianapolis & Louisville Railway Company, Defendant in Error",
  "name_abbreviation": "Kaufman v. Chicago, Indianapolis & Louisville Railway Co.",
  "decision_date": "1916-10-10",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 21,266",
  "first_page": "491",
  "last_page": "492",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "201 Ill. App. 491"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 115,
    "char_count": 1428,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.564,
    "sha256": "931b6dad6284c569e5ff50cc2d4c727de42461aa0b222e8706ffc95ee8be9923",
    "simhash": "1:dd71e3a5502dbe7c",
    "word_count": 222
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:52:04.845486+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Joseph Kaufman and William Bernstein, trading as Joseph Kaufman & Company, Plaintiffs in Error, v. Chicago, Indianapolis & Louisville Railway Company, Defendant in Error."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice McGoorty\ndelivered the opinion of the court.\nAbstract of the Decision.\nCarriers, \u00a7 93 \u2014when exclusion of bill of lading as evidence erroneous. In an action by a consignee of a shipment against a carrier for wrongful detention thereof, held that refusal of the trial court to admit in evidence a bill of lading issued by the carrier, and showing that the shipment was consigned to the plaintiffs, was reversible error.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice McGoorty"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Charles A. Butler, for plaintiffs in error; Frantklin Raber, of counsel.",
      "No appearance for defendant in error."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Joseph Kaufman and William Bernstein, trading as Joseph Kaufman & Company, Plaintiffs in Error, v. Chicago, Indianapolis & Louisville Railway Company, Defendant in Error.\nGen. No. 21,266.\n(Not to he reported in full.)\nError to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. John A. Ma-honey, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the March term, 1915.\nReversed and remanded.\nOpinion filed October 10, 1916.\nStatement of the Case.\nAction by Joseph Kaufman and William Bernstein, trading as Joseph Kaufman & Company, plaintiffs, against the Chicago, Indianapolis & Louisville Railway Company, a corporation, defendant, for damages \u00b0 for wrongful detention of a shipment consigned to the plaintiffs. To review a judgment for defendant, plain-' tiffs prosecute a writ of error.\nCharles A. Butler, for plaintiffs in error; Frantklin Raber, of counsel.\nNo appearance for defendant in error.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0491-01",
  "first_page_order": 533,
  "last_page_order": 534
}