{
  "id": 2960880,
  "name": "The Stag Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. Union Bank of Chicago, Defendant in Error",
  "name_abbreviation": "Stag Co. v. Union Bank of Chicago",
  "decision_date": "1916-10-10",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 21,688",
  "first_page": "510",
  "last_page": "510",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "201 Ill. App. 510"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 140,
    "char_count": 1716,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.523,
    "sha256": "5b1f9efc340814fd90e4d53a3ee09cdfdea184b451f2813aa98e785293ef8cd0",
    "simhash": "1:c5574001780fc0c1",
    "word_count": 303
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:52:04.845486+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "The Stag Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. Union Bank of Chicago, Defendant in Error."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice McGoortt\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice McGoortt"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Meter Morton, for plaintiff in error.",
      "Christian C. H. Zillman, for defendant in error."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "The Stag Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. Union Bank of Chicago, Defendant in Error.\nGen. No. 21,688.\n(Not to be reported in full;).\nAbstract of the Decision.\nBanks and banking, \u00a7 140 \u2014when bank liable to drawer for payment before due of postdated cheek. Where the drawer of a postdated check notified the hank on which it was drawn before the day of its date not to pay it but the hank had already paid it, held that the drawer could recover the full amount of the check from the bank, though the drawer admitted that it had received goods and money from the payee, who had cashed the check, which it had applied in payment of the payee\u2019s general indebtedness to it, the bank not contending that the payee, on making the payment, had directed the drawer as to the manner in which the payment should be applied on his indebtedness.\nError to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. D. H. Wamsley, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the October term, 1915.\nReversed with finding of fact.\nOpinion filed October 10, 1916.\nStatement of the Case.\nAction by the Stag Company, a corporation, plaintiff, against the Union Bank of Chicago, a corporation, defendant, to recover the amount of a postdated check drawn by the plaintiff on the defendant and paid by the latter before the day of its date and before notice to stop payment given before the day of its date. To review a judgment for a part of the amount claimed, plaintiff prosecutes a writ of error.\nMeter Morton, for plaintiff in error.\nChristian C. H. Zillman, for defendant in error.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0510-01",
  "first_page_order": 552,
  "last_page_order": 552
}