{
  "id": 2965506,
  "name": "The People of the State of Illinois ex rel. Annie Mickarczyk, Defendant in Error, v. Louis Wenglarz, Plaintiff in Error",
  "name_abbreviation": "People ex rel. Mickarczyk v. Wenglarz",
  "decision_date": "1916-10-18",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 22,278",
  "first_page": "524",
  "last_page": "525",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "201 Ill. App. 524"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 144,
    "char_count": 1967,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.571,
    "sha256": "36adcce34d02d49674e857976fa221710f07f7a57276d8a973e3da0ce2885bde",
    "simhash": "1:4d35cbafd39ba8fd",
    "word_count": 327
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:52:04.845486+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "The People of the State of Illinois ex rel. Annie Mickarczyk, Defendant in Error, v. Louis Wenglarz, Plaintiff in Error."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Presiding Justice O\u2019Connor\ndelivered the opinion of the court.\n3. Evidence, \u00a7 480 \u2014what is effect of failure of defendant to testify. The defendant sitting silent during the trial of a bastardy proceeding, held a circumstance to be considered against him on the issue as to whether he was the father of the child.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Presiding Justice O\u2019Connor"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Frank A. Ramsey, for plaintiff in error.",
      "Maclay Hoyne, for defendant in error."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "The People of the State of Illinois ex rel. Annie Mickarczyk, Defendant in Error, v. Louis Wenglarz, Plaintiff in Error.\nGen. No. 22,278.\n(Not to he reported in full.)\nAbstract of the Decision.\n1. Bastards, \u00a7 22 \u2014when evidence sufficient to sustain finding that relatrix is unmarried. Where the relatrix in a bastardy proceeding swore in her complaint that she was unmarried, a finding that she was unmarried was held justified in the absence of evidence. that she was married.\n2. Bastards, \u00a7 22*\u2014when evidence sufficient to sustain finding that defendant is father of child. In a bastardy proceeding, a finding that the defendant was the father of the child, held justified where the defendant had not denied that he had had sexual intercourse with the relatrix and the only testimony offered by him tended to show that other men had had sexual intercourse with her about the time of conception, which was denied by the relatrix.\nError to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Jacob H. Hopkins, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the March term, 1916.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed October 18, 1916.\nStatement of the Case.\nBastardy proceedings instituted by the People of the State of Illinois ex rel. Annie Mickarczyk, plaintiff, against Louis Wenglarz, defendant. To review a judgment entered against him, the defendant prosecutes a writ of error.\nFrank A. Ramsey, for plaintiff in error.\nMaclay Hoyne, for defendant in error.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols, XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0524-01",
  "first_page_order": 566,
  "last_page_order": 567
}