{
  "id": 2966604,
  "name": "The People of the State of Illinois, Defendant in Error, v. Rosie Eli, Plaintiff in Error",
  "name_abbreviation": "People v. Eli",
  "decision_date": "1916-10-18",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 22,141",
  "first_page": "550",
  "last_page": "551",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "201 Ill. App. 550"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 127,
    "char_count": 1336,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.562,
    "sha256": "15b59523b14581c121a6a5ef1e65759d41671903f43204daedc7031f8124d36d",
    "simhash": "1:c3ffceb0102fc89c",
    "word_count": 222
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:52:04.845486+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "The People of the State of Illinois, Defendant in Error, v. Rosie Eli, Plaintiff in Error."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mb. Justice Taylor\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mb. Justice Taylor"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Erbstein & Macaulay, for plaintiff in error.",
      "Maclay Hoyne, for defendant in error; Edward E. Wilson, of counsel."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "The People of the State of Illinois, Defendant in Error, v. Rosie Eli, Plaintiff in Error.\nGen. No. 22,141.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nError to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. John J. Rooney, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the March term, 1916.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed October 18, 1916.\nStatement of the Case.\nProsecution by the People of the State of Illinois, plaintiff, against Eosie Eli, defendant. To review a judgment against her, the defendant prosecutes a writ of error.\nErbstein & Macaulay, for plaintiff in error.\nMaclay Hoyne, for defendant in error; Edward E. Wilson, of counsel.\nAbstract of the Decision.\nCriminal law, \u00a7 472 \u2014how defect in information must he taken advantage of. Where the defendant in a prosecution for larceny was present in court, waived trial by jury, submitted to the jurisdiction of the court and made no objection to the form of the information charging her with the larceny of a certain number of dollars, lawful money of the United States, without more definitely describing it, held that in the absence of a motion to quash the information, as defective for uncertainty, a conviction must be sustained.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0550-01",
  "first_page_order": 592,
  "last_page_order": 593
}