#### William C. Miller and Alfred Hall, copartners, trading as Miller & Hall, Defendants in Error, v. Joseph Burns, Plaintiff in Error.

Gen. No. 22,317.

(Not to he reported in full.)

Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Samuel H. Trude, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1916.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed December 18, 1916.

Statement of the Case.

Action by William O. Miller and Alfred Hall, co-partners, trading as Miller & Hall, plaintiffs, against Joseph Bums, defendant, to recover for services as architects in making plans, drawings and specifications and taking cost estimates for making certain alterations in defendant’s store premises. From a judgment for plaintiff for $110, defendant brings error.

*222Albert H. Fry, for plaintiff in error.

Arthur A. Basse, for defendants in error.

Abstract of the Decision.

Architects and engineers, § 16 * —when evidence sufficient to sustain judgment for plaintiffs in action to recover for services. In an action by architects to recover for services in making plans, drawings and specifications and in taking cost estimates for making certain alterations in defendant’s store premises, evidence held sufficient to sustain a judgment for plaintiffs.

*

See Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number.

Mr. Justice Deter

delivered the opinion of the court.