{
  "id": 5417128,
  "name": "Charles M. Weber, Defendant in Error, v. Henry C. Krueger, Plaintiff in Error",
  "name_abbreviation": "Weber v. Krueger",
  "decision_date": "1916-11-15",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 21,196",
  "first_page": "57",
  "last_page": "58",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "202 Ill. App. 57"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 139,
    "char_count": 1507,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.534,
    "sha256": "e0fe76de69b0f102713f491648c071b8742ea80bb6c2c0ace71b9f47bc44ee65",
    "simhash": "1:d37dd8b57184a8bc",
    "word_count": 256
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:59:19.228114+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Charles M. Weber, Defendant in Error, v. Henry C. Krueger, Plaintiff in Error."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Presiding Justice 0 \u2019Connor\ndelivered the opinion of the court.\nAbstract of the Decision.\n1. Appeal and' error, \u00a7 1567 \u2014When correctness of ruling on proposition of law immaterial'. Where in a case tried hy the court without a jury the ultimate facts found by the court are such that no judgment would stand except that entered, the question whether there was error in a ruling on a proposition of law is immaterial.\n2. Appeal and error, \u00a7 1414*\u2014when findings of fact hy court will not he reviewed. Where the evidence heard at the trial is not in the record, the Appellate Court will not review findings of fact by the trial court trying the case without a jury.-",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Presiding Justice 0 \u2019Connor"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Otto C. Rentner, for plaintiff in error.",
      "John C. Lews and Frederick Sass, for defendant in error."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Charles M. Weber, Defendant in Error, v. Henry C. Krueger, Plaintiff in Error.\nGen. No. 21,196.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nError to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Harry M. Fisher, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the March term, 1915.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed November 15, 1916.\nStatement of the Case.\nAction by Charles M. Weber, plaintiff, against jTonv-ir i \\ Krueger, defendant, in the Municipal Court of Chicago, to recover commissions as a real estate broker for obtaining a purchaser for defendant\u2019s property. To reverse a judgment for plaintiff'for $83.75, defendant prosecutes this writ of error.\nOtto C. Rentner, for plaintiff in error.\nJohn C. Lews and Frederick Sass, for defendant in error.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0057-01",
  "first_page_order": 83,
  "last_page_order": 84
}