{
  "id": 5411158,
  "name": "Frank Kieshkowski, Appellee, v. Harry Bostrom, Appellant",
  "name_abbreviation": "Kieshkowski v. Bostrom",
  "decision_date": "1916-12-13",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 21,371",
  "first_page": "189",
  "last_page": "190",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "202 Ill. App. 189"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 159,
    "char_count": 1953,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.561,
    "sha256": "6dcb2634f0f47ad9b7eae4d62aca24cae36f93f6f26c83a906faba3b0452c897",
    "simhash": "1:885de1255800a299",
    "word_count": 323
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:59:19.228114+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Frank Kieshkowski, Appellee, v. Harry Bostrom, Appellant."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Goodwin\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Goodwin"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "O. D. Olsoh, for appellant.",
      "John W. Sutton, for appellee; Martin L. Wilborn, of counsel."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Frank Kieshkowski, Appellee, v. Harry Bostrom, Appellant.\nGen. No. 21,371.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nAppeal from the County Court of Cook county; the Hon. J. J. Cooke, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the March term, 1915.\nReversed and remanded.\nOpinion filed December 13, 1916.\nStatement of the Case.\nAction by Frank Kieshkowski, plaintiff, against Harry Bostrom, defendant, on an appeal bond. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.\nO. D. Olsoh, for appellant.\nJohn W. Sutton, for appellee; Martin L. Wilborn, of counsel.\nAbstract of the Decision.\n1. Appeal and error, \u00a7 1870 \u2014what constitutes a discharge of obligor in appeal bond. In an action on an appeal bond, held that the plaintiff\u2019s demurrers to defendant\u2019s plea, setting out that while the appeal was pending the plaintiff agreed to and did discharge the obligation in consideration' of the defendant\u2019s paying him a less amount than that of the judgment, were improperly sustained inasmuch as the defendant was not obliged to pay the plaintiff in any event until the appeal was disposed of, so that the immediate payment of a lesser sum than that of the judgment was a sufficient consideration for the release thereof.\n2. Appeal and error, \u00a7 1881*\u2014when plea of discharge of obligor sufficient on demurrer. In an action on an appeal bond, obligating the defendant to pay the judgment with interest and costs in the Appellate Court if it should be affirmed, held that demurrers to the defendant\u2019s plea, setting out a satisfaction and discharge of the judgment pending appeal, were improperly sustained on the ground that the plea did not answer the entire declaration, since the plea fully answered the alleged breach in failing to pay the judgment, which was in reality the substance of the action.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0189-01",
  "first_page_order": 215,
  "last_page_order": 216
}