{
  "id": 5413094,
  "name": "David W. Mankowitz, Defendant in Error, v. Kersten Company, Plaintiff in Error",
  "name_abbreviation": "Mankowitz v. Kersten Co.",
  "decision_date": "1916-12-18",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 22,233",
  "first_page": "201",
  "last_page": "201",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "202 Ill. App. 201"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 121,
    "char_count": 1348,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.513,
    "sha256": "6db056c805469ef64be66d2d2e7577ecb6a74e24c1f7a7101b547328848ef0c1",
    "simhash": "1:b37b5abd960a203d",
    "word_count": 220
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:59:19.228114+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "David W. Mankowitz, Defendant in Error, v. Kersten Company, Plaintiff in Error."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Presiding Justice McSurely\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Presiding Justice McSurely"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Otto C. Rentner, for plaintiff in error. \u25a0",
      "Fred F. Weinman and Jacob Kaplan, for defendant in error."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "David W. Mankowitz, Defendant in Error, v. Kersten Company, Plaintiff in Error.\nGen. No. 22,233.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nError to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Joseph S. La Buy, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1916.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed December 18, 1916.\nStatement of the Case.\nAction by David W. Mankowitz, plaintiff, against the Kersten Company, a corporation, defendant, to recover damages alleged to have been sustained by the failure of the defendant to deliver certain metal purchased by plaintiff. From a judgment for plaintiff for $67.75, upon trial by the court, defendant brings error.\nOtto C. Rentner, for plaintiff in error. \u25a0\nFred F. Weinman and Jacob Kaplan, for defendant in error.\nAbstract of the Decision.\nSales, \u00a7 373 \u2014when evidence sufficient to sustain verdict in action for damages for nondelivery of goods. In an action by the purchaser of merchandise to recover damages alleged to have been sustained by the failure of the seller to make delivery, evidence held sufficient to show that plaintiff had proved his case by a preponderance of the evidence, and that he had .sustained damage for the amount claimed.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vole. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0201-01",
  "first_page_order": 227,
  "last_page_order": 227
}