{
  "id": 5415018,
  "name": "Emilio Longhi, trading as Italian & Greek Products Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. Frederick Sabatini, Defendant in Error",
  "name_abbreviation": "Longhi v. Sabatini",
  "decision_date": "1916-12-18",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 21,451",
  "first_page": "213",
  "last_page": "213",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "202 Ill. App. 213"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 145,
    "char_count": 1736,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.563,
    "sha256": "ac13c2d1b9780684d9b4fa0276c54e49eded09a7305a65a745120155d36914d2",
    "simhash": "1:ef6dfa14d00538ba",
    "word_count": 288
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:59:19.228114+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Emilio Longhi, trading as Italian & Greek Products Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. Frederick Sabatini, Defendant in Error."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Dever\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Dever"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Caxroli Gigliotti, for plaintiff in error.",
      "No appearance for defendant in error."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Emilio Longhi, trading as Italian & Greek Products Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. Frederick Sabatini, Defendant in Error.\nGen. No. 21,451.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nError to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Charles A. Williams, Judge, presiding. Heard In this court at the October term, 1916.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed December 18, 1916.\nStatement of the Case.\n\u2022 Action by Emilio Longhi, trading as Italian & Greek Products Company, plaintiff, against Frederick Sabatini, defendant, to recover money alleged to have been collected by the defendant while acting as agent for the plaintiff. To review a judgment for defendant, plaintiff prosecutes a writ of error.\nCaxroli Gigliotti, for plaintiff in error.\nNo appearance for defendant in error.\nAbstract of the Decision.\n1. Appeal and error, \u00a7 1034 \u2014what Appellate Court will not take judicial notice of. The Appellate Court cannot take judicial notice of the rules of the Municipal Court of Chicago.\n2. Appeal and error, \u00a7 1319*\u2014when ruling on motion in trial court presumed correct. Where a reversal was sought on behalf of a defendant on the ground that the trial court had erroneously refused to grant a postponement of the trial because the defendant\u2019s attorney was actually engaged in the trial of a case in another court, held that as no affidavit was presented to the trial court at the time the motion was made, the Appellate Court had no means of determining on the record whether the action of the trial court was or was not an abuse of discretion, the presumption being that the court acted legally and fairly.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest. Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number"
  },
  "file_name": "0213-01",
  "first_page_order": 239,
  "last_page_order": 239
}