{
  "id": 5411179,
  "name": "Fred Krell, Plaintiff in Error, v. August Meyer, Defendant in Error",
  "name_abbreviation": "Krell v. Meyer",
  "decision_date": "1916-12-27",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 21,546",
  "first_page": "307",
  "last_page": "308",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "202 Ill. App. 307"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 122,
    "char_count": 1328,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.526,
    "sha256": "66dd13f9d53fcd421874537815a3f59d95b22bd7c7197e47f608ff4d08e1ddb2",
    "simhash": "1:875bc0e550af32b9",
    "word_count": 216
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:59:19.228114+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Fred Krell, Plaintiff in Error, v. August Meyer, Defendant in Error."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Presiding Justice O\u2019Connor\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Presiding Justice O\u2019Connor"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Huttmann, Cloves, Netherton & Carr, for plaintiff in error.",
      "Albert H. Meads, for defendant in error."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Fred Krell, Plaintiff in Error, v. August Meyer, Defendant in Error.\nGen. No. 21,546.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nError to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Habby M. Fishes, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at-the October term, 1915.\nReversed and judgment here.\nOpinion filed December 27, 1916.\nStatement of the Case.\nAction by Fred Krell, plaintiff, against August Meyer, defendant, for rent, in which the defendant filed a set-off. To reverse a judgment for defendant' on the set-off, plaintiff prosecutes a writ of error..\nHuttmann, Cloves, Netherton & Carr, for plaintiff in error.\nAlbert H. Meads, for defendant in error.\nAbstract of the Decision.\nSames, \u00a7 341 \u2014when evidence does not show promise hy purchaser of stock to pay seller accrued profits thereon. In an action for rent, where judgment was'rendered for the defendant on a set-off based upon an alleged promise by the plaintiff to pay the defendant accrued profits on shares of stock purchased by the plaintiff from the defendant in connection with a real estate deal between the parties, evidence held not to justify a finding that the plaintiff made such promise.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0307-01",
  "first_page_order": 333,
  "last_page_order": 334
}