{
  "id": 5412753,
  "name": "Will H. Latta, Appellant, v. Granite Live Stock Insurance Company and Lillian Levy, Appellees",
  "name_abbreviation": "Latta v. Granite Live Stock Insurance",
  "decision_date": "1916-10-13",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "496",
  "last_page": "496",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "202 Ill. App. 496"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 140,
    "char_count": 1674,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.491,
    "sha256": "bc97370934814b06d3beb2722ca1db0dd531edb1bb381d9704e523fc711a72eb",
    "simhash": "1:0f4ecf2b9d969207",
    "word_count": 265
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:59:19.228114+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Will H. Latta, Appellant, v. Granite Live Stock Insurance Company and Lillian Levy, Appellees."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Hr. Justice Graves\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Hr. Justice Graves"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Bays urn & Buck, for appellant.",
      "DeHange, Gillespie & DeMange and Fiper & Bohrer, for appellees."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Will H. Latta, Appellant, v. Granite Live Stock Insurance Company and Lillian Levy, Appellees.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nAppeal from the Circuit Court of McLean county; the Hon. Colostin D. Myers and Hon. Sain Welty, Judges, presiding. Heard in this court at the April term, 1916.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed October 13, 1916.\nCertiorari denied by Supreme Court (making opinion final).\nStatement of the Case.\nBill in chancery by Will H. Latta, complainant, against the Granite Live Stock Insurance Company and Lillian Levy, defendants, to require the defendant corporation to pay a note given by the complainant to the individual defendant. Both defendants answered the bill and the individual defendant filed a cross-bill praying that the complainant be required to pay the note. From a decree dismissing the bill and granting the relief prayed in the cross-bill, complainant appeals.\nBays urn & Buck, for appellant.\nDeHange, Gillespie & DeMange and Fiper & Bohrer, for appellees.\nAbstract of the Decision.\nBills and notes, \u00a7 50 \u2014when note is based upon sufficient consid-. eration. On a bill to compel a corporation to pay a note given by complainant, a stockholder of defendant corporation, to an individual defendant, the wife of an officer of the corporation, in alleged consideration that he resign and of settlement of a claim of the husband against the corporation, evidence held sufficient to sustain findings that the note was complainant\u2019s own obligation and that it was based upon sufficient consideration.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vois. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0496-01",
  "first_page_order": 522,
  "last_page_order": 522
}