{
  "id": 5416227,
  "name": "E. Bucher Packing Company, Appellee, v. Joe McAllister et al., Appellants",
  "name_abbreviation": "E. Bucher Packing Co. v. McAllister",
  "decision_date": "1916-11-13",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "602",
  "last_page": "603",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "202 Ill. App. 602"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 177,
    "char_count": 2086,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.541,
    "sha256": "6627faed31b2e1ef3cd50ade626b6850ee9c1abec5d8eab5f645ef6d60e121a4",
    "simhash": "1:847f5ea3ba0e8e18",
    "word_count": 347
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:59:19.228114+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "E. Bucher Packing Company, Appellee, v. Joe McAllister et al., Appellants."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Presiding Justice Higbee\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Presiding Justice Higbee"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Charles L. Bice, for appellants.",
      "Mtt.t.f/r & Britton and George B. Baker, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "E. Bucher Packing Company, Appellee, v. Joe McAllister et al., Appellants.\n(Not to he reported in full.)\nAppeal from the Circuit Court of Pulaski county; the Hon. A. W. Lewis, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the March term, 1916.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed November 13, 1916.\nStatement of the Case.\nAction of assumpsit aided by attachment by E. Bucher Packing Company, plaintiff, against Joe Mc-Allister, defendant, I. J. Hudson interpleading and claiming the property under a chattel mortgage. From a judgment for plaintiff for- $371.43 and costs, defendants appeal.\nCharles L. Bice, for appellants.\nMtt.t.f/r & Britton and George B. Baker, for appellee.\nAbstract of the Decision.\n1. Contracts, \u00a7 387 -\u2014When evidence is sufficient to sustain verdict for plaintiff on issue of nonperformance. Evidence held sufficient to sustain the finding and judgment for plaintiff on issue of nonperformance of contract.\n2. Appeal and error, \u00a7 624*\u2014when appeal must he prayed for and allowed. Where the holder of a chattel mortgage executed by the defendant in an attachment suit upon the property attached interpleaded in said suit and excepted to the judgment therein in favor of the plaintiff, signed the defendant\u2019s appeal bond, and joined in the defendant\u2019s assignment of errors in the brief and argument filed in the case, but did not himself pray for or effect an appeal, held that it was imperative that an appeal be prayed for and allowed at the term at which the judgment, order or decree was entered, and motion to dismiss appeal by such interpleader should be sustained.\n3. Appeal and error, \u00a7 1265*\u2014when presumed that court applied law to facts in case correctly. In the absence of any propositions of law presented by appellant or question raised as to the correctness of the rulings of the court on the evidence as to appellant, it must be presumed the court applied the law to the facts in the case correctly. i\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0602-01",
  "first_page_order": 628,
  "last_page_order": 629
}