{
  "id": 5413213,
  "name": "F. E. Nulsen, Defendant in Error, v. Terre Haute Brewing Company, Plaintiff in Error",
  "name_abbreviation": "Nulsen v. Terre Haute Brewing Co.",
  "decision_date": "1916-11-13",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "119",
  "last_page": "119",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "203 Ill. App. 119"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 155,
    "char_count": 1842,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.539,
    "sha256": "49133ed954a561979d55ccf7a1be06014d0c4b87facf5b34dc1ce8b0dd9e93db",
    "simhash": "1:8ed8c23fc80da21c",
    "word_count": 307
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T17:03:43.745976+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "F. E. Nulsen, Defendant in Error, v. Terre Haute Brewing Company, Plaintiff in Error."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice McBride\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice McBride"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Keefe & Sullivan, for plaintiff in error.",
      "Kramer, Kramer & Campbell, for defendant in error."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "F. E. Nulsen, Defendant in Error, v. Terre Haute Brewing Company, Plaintiff in Error.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nAbstract of the Decision.\n1. Principal and agent, \u00a7 102 \u2014when duty lies on third person to make inquiry and ascertain real authority of agent. A person who has notice of such facts as to put him on inquiry as to the authority of an agent to make a lease acts at his peril in accepting a lease from such agent without making inquiry and ascertaining the agent\u2019s real authority, notwithstanding such agent may have apparent authority, and it is his right and duty to make such inquiry.\n2. Appeal and error, \u00a7 1241 \u2014when party may not complain of erroneous instruction. A party may not complain of an instruction which sets forth a correct principle of law as misleading where he himself procures an instruction on the same subject.\n3. Instructions, \u00a7 151 \u2014when refusal of is not error. It is not error to refuse \u2022 requested instructions which are covered by other given instructions.\n4. Instructions, \u00a7 63 \u2014when instruction is not erroneous as assuming controverted facts. An instruction is not erroneous as assuming controverted facts where, when considered with other instructions, such impression is not given.\nError to the City Court of East St. Louis; the Hon. W. M. Vandeventer, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the March term, 1916.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed November 13, 1916.\nStatement of the Case.\nAction by F. E. Nulsen, plaintiff, against Terre Haute Brewing Company, defendant, for rent. From a judgment in favor of plaintiff for $780, defendant brings error.\nKeefe & Sullivan, for plaintiff in error.\nKramer, Kramer & Campbell, for defendant in error.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0119-01",
  "first_page_order": 143,
  "last_page_order": 143
}