{
  "id": 5409564,
  "name": "Good Products Company, Defendant in Error, v. James J. Dwyer, Plaintiff in Error",
  "name_abbreviation": "Good Products Co. v. Dwyer",
  "decision_date": "1917-01-08",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 22,511",
  "first_page": "217",
  "last_page": "218",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "203 Ill. App. 217"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 141,
    "char_count": 1595,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.535,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 5.676830387708631e-08,
      "percentile": 0.35517649870706747
    },
    "sha256": "f4c6f525ee6598d7ff7fe3787d1a138c765a6d32085c7526d402ace476092fec",
    "simhash": "1:8e49200bd82873fe",
    "word_count": 260
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T17:03:43.745976+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Good Products Company, Defendant in Error, v. James J. Dwyer, Plaintiff in Error."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Holdom\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Holdom"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Alfred E. Barr and Frank W. Bigelow, for plaintiff in error.",
      "Walter S. Holden and Gr. Fred Bush, for defendant in error."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Good Products Company, Defendant in Error, v. James J. Dwyer, Plaintiff in Error.\nGen. No. 22,511.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nError to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Hosea W. Wells, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1916.\nReversed and judgment of nil capiat and for costs.\nOpinion filed January 8, 1917.\nStatement of the Case.\nAction by Good Products Company, a corporation, plaintiff, against James J. Dwyer and Gustav Hochstadter, defendants, to recover on a contract with Dwyer whereby plaintiff agreed to perforin certain work on a building owned by Hochstadter, which was being constructed by Dwyer as contractor, and against Dwyer and Hochstadter upon an award of arbitrators. From a judgment in favor of plaintiff against defendant Dwyer, after dismissal of the case against defendant Hochstadter, defendant Dwyer brings error.\nAbstract of the Decision.\n1. Accord and satisfaction, \u00a7 1 \u2014what is subject of. A claim for an unliquidated amount is a proper subject of accord and satisfaction.\n2. Accord and satisfaction, \u00a7 6 \u2014when third person is bound by settlement. A settlement of a disputed claim for labor performed in the construction of a building by a subcontractor between such subcontractor and the owner constitutes an' accord and satisfaction as to the contractor.\nAlfred E. Barr and Frank W. Bigelow, for plaintiff in error.\nWalter S. Holden and Gr. Fred Bush, for defendant in error.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV. and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0217-01",
  "first_page_order": 241,
  "last_page_order": 242
}