{
  "id": 5409538,
  "name": "Arthur C. Marshall, Plantiff in Error, v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad Company, Defendant in Error",
  "name_abbreviation": "Marshall v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad",
  "decision_date": "1917-01-08",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 22,525",
  "first_page": "220",
  "last_page": "220",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "203 Ill. App. 220"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 149,
    "char_count": 1774,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.533,
    "sha256": "c7be71e5e2f55a3b22128471033a77cece5f2424bfbe894bfa9b724821f61d8e",
    "simhash": "1:dd83c61bd19c966c",
    "word_count": 291
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T17:03:43.745976+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Arthur C. Marshall, Plantiff in Error, v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad Company, Defendant in Error."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Holdom\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Holdom"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Stewart Reed Brown, for plaintiff in error.",
      "Adams, Follansbee, Hawley & Shorey, for defendant in error."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Arthur C. Marshall, Plantiff in Error, v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad Company, Defendant in Error.\nGen. No. 22,525.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nAbstract of the Decision.\nMunicipal Court oe Chicago, \u00a7 13 \u2014when affidavit of defense is sufficient. In an action by a shipper against the carrier to recover damages for the negligent shipment of fruit, an affidavit of defense in which defendant denied that the fruit was delivered to the initial carrier in sound condition, that it was damaged while in its possession by any act on its part or that any damage resulted to the fruit while in its possession, and averred that the fruit was sold by defendant in a damaged condition after notice to plaintiff, and at its request, that the net amount realized from the sale, being the amount of judgment, was tendered to plaintiff and refused, that defendant acted in good faith, and that no notice of plaintiff\u2019s claim was made within four months, as required by the terms of the contract to carry, held sufficient.\nError to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Hosea W. Wells, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1916.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed January 8, 1917.\nRehearing denied January 22, 1917.\nStatement of the Case.\nAction by Arthur C. Marshall, plaintiff, against Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad Company, a corporation, defendant, to recover damages for the negligent shipment of fruit. From a judgment for $99.20, being only a part of the claim, plaintiff brings error.\nStewart Reed Brown, for plaintiff in error.\nAdams, Follansbee, Hawley & Shorey, for defendant in error.\nSoe Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same tppio and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0220-01",
  "first_page_order": 244,
  "last_page_order": 244
}