{
  "id": 5408615,
  "name": "Louis Rosenbluth, trading as Anchor Mills, Appellant, v. Heintz Food Company of Illinois, Appellee",
  "name_abbreviation": "Rosenbluth v. Heintz Food Co.",
  "decision_date": "1917-01-08",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 22,545",
  "first_page": "226",
  "last_page": "226",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "203 Ill. App. 226"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 147,
    "char_count": 1674,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.569,
    "sha256": "085d54bafd4d73ff9d4acc1361eeb328733dc191448a6384484a316ba148d236",
    "simhash": "1:15536d041c25b2f9",
    "word_count": 276
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T17:03:43.745976+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Louis Rosenbluth, trading as Anchor Mills, Appellant, v. Heintz Food Company of Illinois, Appellee."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Holdom\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Holdom"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Richard T. Munzer, for appellant.",
      "No appearance for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Louis Rosenbluth, trading as Anchor Mills, Appellant, v. Heintz Food Company of Illinois, Appellee.\nGen. No. 22,545.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nAbstract of the Decision.\n1. Sales, \u00a7 401 \u2014when evidence is sufficient to sustain claim of set-off. In an action to recover for the value of flour sold where defendant interposed a set-off claiming damages suffered by it by reason of the fact that plaintiff failed to deliver winter wheat flour as required by the contract, and in its stead had delivered corn flour, causing loss of two batches of biscuits, in the making of which the corn flour was used, evidence held sufficient to sustain the claim of set-off.\n2. Appeal and error, \u00a7 1414 \u2014when finding of trial court upon conflicting evidence will not be disturbed. The finding of a trial court upon conflicting evidence will not be disturbed on appeal where such finding is not contrary to the probative force of the evidence.\nAppeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. John K. Pbindiville, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term\u2019, 1916.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed January 8, 1917.\nRehearing denied January 22, 1917.\nStatement of the Case.\nAction by Louis Rosenbluth, trading as the Anchor Mills, plaintiff, against Heintz Food Company of Illinois, a corporation, defendant, to recover for flour sold and delivered at various times to defendant. From a judgment for defendant for $66.44 on a claim of set-off, plaintiff appeals.\nRichard T. Munzer, for appellant.\nNo appearance for appellee.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vola. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, game topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0226-01",
  "first_page_order": 250,
  "last_page_order": 250
}