{
  "id": 5413488,
  "name": "W. B. Fuller, for use of Nell E. Jordan, Appellee, v. Bridgeport Wood Finishing Company, Appellant",
  "name_abbreviation": "Fuller ex rel. Jordan v. Bridgeport Wood Finishing Co.",
  "decision_date": "1917-01-08",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 22,565",
  "first_page": "227",
  "last_page": "228",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "203 Ill. App. 227"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 160,
    "char_count": 1783,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.55,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 8.834646221089719e-08,
      "percentile": 0.49802691199371085
    },
    "sha256": "10704c5be5ed2736464cfa1ffe79917cbc3d1e6383f79ba180b20708f165ada0",
    "simhash": "1:17474a2c328dd4c2",
    "word_count": 302
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T17:03:43.745976+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "W. B. Fuller, for use of Nell E. Jordan, Appellee, v. Bridgeport Wood Finishing Company, Appellant."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Holdom\ndelivered the opinion of the court.\n4. Exemptions, \u00a7 5 \u2014when wages of nonresident are exempt from garnishment. A nonresident debtor whose wages are earned in a foreign State is entitled to the exemption of the State of his residence.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Holdom"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Elbert C. Ferguson, for appellant.",
      "No appearance for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "W. B. Fuller, for use of Nell E. Jordan, Appellee, v. Bridgeport Wood Finishing Company, Appellant.\nGen. No. 22,565.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nAbstract of the Decision.\n1. Garnishment, \u00a7 93 \u2014when answer must he taken as true. Where no issue is joined upon an answer in a garnishment action the averment of facts therein stand admitted and must be taken as true.\n2. Garnishment\u2014when right of exemption is preserved hy garnishee. The assertion of the right of exemption of a debtor in an answer by the garnishee is sufficient to preserve such right to the debtor.\n3. Garnishment, \u00a7 35 \u2014what wages employer is required to answer for. Under section 14 of the Garnishment Act as amended in 1901 (J. & A. If 5949), the employer is not required to answer lor the wages earned by a wage earner after the service of the writ.\nAppeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. John Stele, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1916.\nReversed and remanded with directions.\nOpinion filed January 8, 1917.\nStatement of the Case.\nAction of garnishment by W. B. Fuller, for the use of Nell E. Jordan, plaintiff, against the Bridgeport Wood Finishing Company, a corporation, defendant. From a judgment against defendant for $560 as garnishee and ordering that $167.10 thereof be recovered for the use of the beneficial plaintiff, defendant appeals.\nElbert C. Ferguson, for appellant.\nNo appearance for appellee.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number. \u2018 * r"
  },
  "file_name": "0227-01",
  "first_page_order": 251,
  "last_page_order": 252
}