{
  "id": 5410399,
  "name": "Barney Nelson and Axel LeMoon, copartners, trading as Nelson & LeMoon, Defendants in Error, v. A. F. McKeown, Plaintiff in Error",
  "name_abbreviation": "Nelson v. McKeown",
  "decision_date": "1917-01-17",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 21,600",
  "first_page": "231",
  "last_page": "231",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "203 Ill. App. 231"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 141,
    "char_count": 1509,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.541,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 2.0446031217563963e-07,
      "percentile": 0.7529126215466616
    },
    "sha256": "97b81fa054b6a14f509d039dd75a275e04a612d6710c5bc0ad8c08d17404d067",
    "simhash": "1:856bda05563fb2fc",
    "word_count": 243
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T17:03:43.745976+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Barney Nelson and Axel LeMoon, copartners, trading as Nelson & LeMoon, Defendants in Error, v. A. F. McKeown, Plaintiff in Error."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Presiding Justice O\u2019Connor\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Presiding Justice O\u2019Connor"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Edward A. Mechling, for plaintiff in error.",
      "S. T. Slawitsky, for defendants in error."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Barney Nelson and Axel LeMoon, copartners, trading as Nelson & LeMoon, Defendants in Error, v. A. F. McKeown, Plaintiff in Error.\nGen. No. 21,600.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nAbstract of the Decision.\n1. Appeal and error, \u00a7 1414 \u2014when finding of trial court will not be disturbed. The findings of the trial court upon conflicting evidence will not be disturbed on appeal especially where the trial court has had opportunity to see and hear the witnesses.\n2. Bailment\u2014what compensation bailee is entitled to for storage of property. A garage proprietor with whom an automobile had originally been left for repairs and afterwards for storage, held entitled to a reasonable charge for storage of the car up to the time that the owner demanded possession of it.\nError to the Municipal Court of Chi\u00f3ago; the Hon. Joseph P. Rafferty, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the October term, 1915.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed January 17, 1917.\nStatement of the Case.\nAction by Barney Nelson and Axel LeMoon, copartners, trading as Nelson & LeMoon, plaintiffs, against A. F. McKeown, defendant, to recover for repairs and storage of defendant\u2019s automobile and supplies furnished. From a judgment for plaintiffs for $134.68, defendant brings error.\nEdward A. Mechling, for plaintiff in error.\nS. T. Slawitsky, for defendants in error.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vole. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0231-01",
  "first_page_order": 255,
  "last_page_order": 255
}