{
  "id": 5410087,
  "name": "Bridget Corrigan, Defendant in Error, v. North American Union, Plaintiff in Error",
  "name_abbreviation": "Corrigan v. North American Union",
  "decision_date": "1917-01-17",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 21,490",
  "first_page": "250",
  "last_page": "251",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "203 Ill. App. 250"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 139,
    "char_count": 1602,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.543,
    "sha256": "c5dc2e432b4a8cb72e5315ad17b33ea541448ffef54f589e3e5dcf3d8281b7ce",
    "simhash": "1:450bd704c12f0c1e",
    "word_count": 260
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T17:03:43.745976+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Bridget Corrigan, Defendant in Error, v. North American Union, Plaintiff in Error."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Goodwin\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Goodwin"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "C. V. Donovan, for plaintiff in error.",
      "Timothy J. Fell, for defendant in error; Hermann P. Haase, of counsel."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Bridget Corrigan, Defendant in Error, v. North American Union, Plaintiff in Error.\nGen. No. 21,490.\n(Not to he reported in full.)\nError to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. J. J. Sullivan, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the October term,- 1915.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed January 17, 1917.\nStatement of the Case.\nAction by Bridget Corrigan, plaintiff, against North American Union, defendant, to recover on a benefit policy issued to one George Whelan. From a judgment in favor of plaintiff, defendant brings error.\nC. V. Donovan, for plaintiff in error.\nAbstract of the Decision.\n1. Insurance, \u00a7 789 \u2014when evidence is insufficient to show that insured was engaged in prohibited occupation of bartender. In an action on a mutual benefit insurance policy, evidence held insufficient to show that insured, who had been in the habit of frequenting his brother\u2019s saloon, had been engaged in the prohibited occupation of bartender.\n2. Insurance, g 789 \u2014when person occasionally selling liquor is not engaged in prohibited occupation of bartender. Casual sales of liquor made from time to time in a brother\u2019s saloon by one not employed for the purpose and receiving no compensation therefor do not, as a matter of law, constitute him a ^person engaged in the occupation of bartender in violation of a provision of a mutual benefit insurance policy.\nTimothy J. Fell, for defendant in error; Hermann P. Haase, of counsel.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Yola, XI to XV, and; Cumulative Quarterly, sanie topic an# section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0250-01",
  "first_page_order": 274,
  "last_page_order": 275
}