{
  "id": 5410529,
  "name": "The People of the State of Illinois, Defendant in Error, v. Arthur Meyers, Plaintiff in Error",
  "name_abbreviation": "People v. Meyers",
  "decision_date": "1917-01-22",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 22,625",
  "first_page": "298",
  "last_page": "299",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "203 Ill. App. 298"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 129,
    "char_count": 1648,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.545,
    "sha256": "6d40ea2d7fa7fb63616a4a595f32949f7451b85b68d374d94f2f9fbb21aacccc",
    "simhash": "1:1b77c02133adfcfc",
    "word_count": 277
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T17:03:43.745976+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "The People of the State of Illinois, Defendant in Error, v. Arthur Meyers, Plaintiff in Error."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Holdom\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Holdom"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Arthur H. Simms, for plaintiff in error.",
      "Maclay Hoyne, for defendant in, error."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "The People of the State of Illinois, Defendant in Error, v. Arthur Meyers, Plaintiff in Error.\nGen. No. 22,625.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nError to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Ruzus P. Robinson, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1916.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed January 22, 1917.\nStatement of the Case.\nInformation by the People of the State of Illinois, plaintiff, against Arthur Meyers, defendant, for violation by defendant of Rev. St. ch. 38, sec. 57al [Cal. Ill. St. Supp. 1916, \u00b63591(1)], providing for a penalty for being an inmate of a house of prostitution. From a judgment of conviction, upon trial by the court, and sentence of six months, defendant brings error.\nAbstract of the Decision.\n1. Disorderly house, \u00a7 6 -\u2014when evidence sufficient to sustain conviction for being immate of house of prostitution. Evidence held sufficient to sustain a finding, beyond all reasonable doubt, of defendant\u2019s guilt as charged in an information, under Rev. St. ch. 38, sec. 57al [Cal. Ill. St. Supp. 1916, if 3591 (1)], providing for a penalty for being an immate of a house of prostitution.\n2. Criminal law, \u00a7 150 \u2014when particeps criminis is competent. A particeps criminis is a competent witness under an information for violation of Rev. St. ch. 38, sec. 57al [Cal. Ill. St.' Supp. 1916, ][ 3591(1)], providing for a penalty for being an inmate of a house of prostitution.\nArthur H. Simms, for plaintiff in error.\nMaclay Hoyne, for defendant in, error.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0298-01",
  "first_page_order": 322,
  "last_page_order": 323
}