{
  "id": 5411843,
  "name": "Bridget O'Brien, Defendant in Error, v. Peter P. Salerno, Plaintiff in Error",
  "name_abbreviation": "O'Brien v. Salerno",
  "decision_date": "1917-02-07",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 21,066",
  "first_page": "356",
  "last_page": "356",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "203 Ill. App. 356"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 144,
    "char_count": 1746,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.564,
    "sha256": "c32ff10bee5a05e571967b3756b5269b9afae65f287655af00b8a981188cc761",
    "simhash": "1:453ef03cf057801c",
    "word_count": 286
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T17:03:43.745976+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Bridget O\u2019Brien, Defendant in Error, v. Peter P. Salerno, Plaintiff in Error."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Goodwin\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Goodwin"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Cantwell & Smith, for plaintiff in error.",
      "Farrell & Thompson, for defendant in error."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Bridget O\u2019Brien, Defendant in Error, v. Peter P. Salerno, Plaintiff in Error.\nGen. No. 21,066.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nAbstract of the Decision.\n1. Appeal and ebror, \u00a7 1303 \u2014when presumed that there was evidence sufficient to sustain finding of court. Where a bill of exceptions recited that it contained \u201cas much evidence as recollected by counsel and court and introduced on the trial,\u201d held that as the bill did not purport to contain allN the evidence the law conclusively presumed that there was evidence sufficient to sustain the finding of the court.\n2. Appeal and error, \u00a7 1488 \u2014when judgment on trial By court will not he reversed for improper admission of evidence. A judgment on trial by the court without a jury will not be reversed on account of the court\u2019s improper admission of evidence where there is sufficient competent evidence to sustain the judgment, as the court is presumed to have disregarded evidence improperly admitted.\nError to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Edmund K. Jabecki, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the March term, 1915.\nAffirmed.\u00bb\nOpinion filed February 7, 1917.\nStatement of the Case.\nAction by Bridget O\u2019Brien, plaintiff, against Peter P. Salerno, defendant, to recover damages for personal injuries caused by defendant carelessly and negligently leaving a horse hitched to a wagon untied in the street. From a judgment for plaintiff for six hundred dollars, on trial by the court without a jury, defendant brings error.\nCantwell & Smith, for plaintiff in error.\nFarrell & Thompson, for defendant in error.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols, XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0356-01",
  "first_page_order": 380,
  "last_page_order": 380
}