{
  "id": 2942304,
  "name": "John Jaegle, Appellee, v. Estate of Emil Jaegle, Appellant",
  "name_abbreviation": "Jaegle v. Estate of Jaegle",
  "decision_date": "1917-02-10",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 6,382",
  "first_page": "154",
  "last_page": "155",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "204 Ill. App. 154"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 156,
    "char_count": 1769,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.579,
    "sha256": "6749628e47fcdda60613ff6bc9b86fb66ae9ff64b06d8ab32f48550b7ce2146a",
    "simhash": "1:1317d1ef3019b079",
    "word_count": 303
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:49:07.214052+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "John Jaegle, Appellee, v. Estate of Emil Jaegle, Appellant."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Dibell\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Dibell"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Robert E. Larkin and H. M. Kelly, for appellant.",
      "W. A. Panneck, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "John Jaegle, Appellee, v. Estate of Emil Jaegle, Appellant.\nGen. No. 6,382.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nAbstract of the Decision.\n1. Executors and administrators, \u00a7 270 \u2014when evidence insufficient to sustain claim. Evidence held insufficient to show any basis from which the jury could decide what wages ought to be allowed the claimant on account of work done for the intestate, in a claim in the Probate Court against an estate to recover for such work.\n2. Landlord and tenant, \u00a7 325*\u2014when evidence sufficient to show agreement for occupancy of premises free of rent. Evidence held to show that the claimant and the intestate agreed that on expiration of the intestate\u2019s lease of the claimant\u2019s land the claimant should live with the intestate on said land and that the intestate should have the use thereof, in a claim in the Prohate Court to recover for rent.\nAppeal from the Circuit Court of La Salle county; the Hon. Edgar Eldredge, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1916.\nReversed and remanded.\nOpinion filed February 10, 1917.\nStatement of the Case.\nClaim filed in the Probate Court of La Salle county by John Jaegle, claimant, against the estate of Emil Jaegle, defendant, to recover $1,500 for labor and services performed for the deceased in his lifetime, and $1,539 for rent of thirty-eight acres of land from March 1, 1906 to March 1, 1915, at $4.50 per acre, as per lease. From a judgment by the Circuit Court, on appeal, for the claimant for $1,500, the administratrix for said estate appeals.\nRobert E. Larkin and H. M. Kelly, for appellant.\nW. A. Panneck, for appellee.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0154-01",
  "first_page_order": 180,
  "last_page_order": 181
}