{
  "id": 2947319,
  "name": "Nathan Wolf and Morris Choynski, Appellees, v. Selig Polyscope Company et al., Appellants",
  "name_abbreviation": "Wolf v. Selig Polyscope Co.",
  "decision_date": "1917-02-19",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 22,644",
  "first_page": "178",
  "last_page": "179",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "204 Ill. App. 178"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 168,
    "char_count": 1917,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.533,
    "sha256": "402069a66904353f4299df9849360fe46212b50dfdfc2c176e8ea82dcc83117c",
    "simhash": "1:091bd68d980d629d",
    "word_count": 293
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:49:07.214052+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Nathan Wolf and Morris Choynski, Appellees, v. Selig Polyscope Company et al., Appellants."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Presiding Justice McSurely\ndelivered the opinion of the court.\n2. Saxes, \u00a7 16 \u2014what are requisites of contract as to definiteness. A contract of sale, to be enforceable, must be definite as to amount, the price, terms of payment, and time of delivery.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Presiding Justice McSurely"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "William A. Jennings, Richard J. Cooney and John A. Verhoeven, for appellants.",
      "Sonnenschein,\" Berkson & Fishell, for appellees."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Nathan Wolf and Morris Choynski, Appellees, v. Selig Polyscope Company et al., Appellants.\nGen. No. 22,644.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nAbstract of the Decision.\n1. Sales, \u00a7 1 \u2014when evidence insufficient to show contract. Evidence held to show that no contracts of sale were entered into between the plaintiffs and the defendants respectively which defendants conspired to break, in an action to recover damages, charging that the defendants had so conspired.\nAppeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. H. Sterling Pomeroy, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1916.\nReversed with finding of facts.\nOpinion filed February 19, 1917.\nStatement of the Case.\nAction by Nathan Wolf and Morris Choynski, plaintiffs, against the Selig Polyscope Company, a corporation, George Kleine and Essanay Film Manufacturing Company, a corporation, defendants, charging conspiracy to injure plaintiffs\u2019 business. Prom' a judgment for plaintiffs for $2,000, defendants appeal.\nThe plaintiffs were engaged in the exhibition business and the business of buying and selling motion picture posters. The defendants were motion picture film manufacturers or producers, and in connection with such business printed and distributed posters which they sold to theater proprietors for advertising purposes at\" their theaters.\nWilliam A. Jennings, Richard J. Cooney and John A. Verhoeven, for appellants.\nSonnenschein,\" Berkson & Fishell, for appellees.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topis and section number,\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0178-01",
  "first_page_order": 204,
  "last_page_order": 205
}