{
  "id": 2949037,
  "name": "Alma Heizer, Defendant in Error, v. John W. Heizer, Plaintiff in Error",
  "name_abbreviation": "Heizer v. Heizer",
  "decision_date": "1917-02-19",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 22,620",
  "first_page": "200",
  "last_page": "201",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "204 Ill. App. 200"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 135,
    "char_count": 1337,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.559,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 1.2240919645422112e-07,
      "percentile": 0.6025322325741771
    },
    "sha256": "86f33661b6ac3a355b91b406632c3bff4fd6d412594fa302184fa2a85763e89a",
    "simhash": "1:071ea4155a1d42dc",
    "word_count": 218
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:49:07.214052+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Alma Heizer, Defendant in Error, v. John W. Heizer, Plaintiff in Error."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Dever\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Dever"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "G. A. Buresh, for plaintiff in error; Otto Wadewitz, of counsel.",
      "Otto Schusterman and F. A. Woodbury, for defendant in error."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Alma Heizer, Defendant in Error, v. John W. Heizer, Plaintiff in Error.\nGen. No. 22,620.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nError to the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. Lockwood Honore, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1916.\nReversed.\nOpinion filed February 19, 1917.\nStatement of the Case.\nSuit by Alma, Heizer, complainant, against John W. Heizer, defendant, for divorce. From a decree fixing at $2,862.07 the amount of alimony due under the original decree granting a divorce and certain alimony, defendant brings error.\nG. A. Buresh, for plaintiff in error; Otto Wadewitz, of counsel.\nOtto Schusterman and F. A. Woodbury, for defendant in error.\nAbstract of the Decision.\nDivorce, \u00a7 106 \u2014when decree for alimony is too indefinite. A decree directing the payment as alimony in a suit for divorce of one-half of the husband\u2019s weekly earnings, after deducting his car fare, labor union dues, life insurance and such other expenses as were necessarily connected with his - employment, held erroneous as being too indefinite and uncertain in amount to he enforceable, and the court had no jurisdiction to enter a subsequent order attempting to enforce it.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0200-01",
  "first_page_order": 226,
  "last_page_order": 227
}