{
  "id": 2948583,
  "name": "Effie C. Kuebler, Appellee, v. George J. Kuebler, Appellant",
  "name_abbreviation": "Kuebler v. Kuebler",
  "decision_date": "1917-03-08",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 22,986",
  "first_page": "259",
  "last_page": "260",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "204 Ill. App. 259"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 187,
    "char_count": 2859,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.541,
    "sha256": "870d84ba0896017eabaad861b5998d695ee53207c1649587602bdec16898e0a1",
    "simhash": "1:bdc09df9e00c7aab",
    "word_count": 476
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:49:07.214052+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Effie C. Kuebler, Appellee, v. George J. Kuebler, Appellant."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Goodwin\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Goodwin"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Albert H. Fry, for appellant.",
      "Charles M. Haft, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Effie C. Kuebler, Appellee, v. George J. Kuebler, Appellant.\nGen. No. 22,986.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nAppeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. Chables M. Thompson, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the March term, 1917.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed March 8, 1917.\nRehearing denied March 28, 1917.\nStatement of the Case.\nSuit by Effie C. Kuebler, complainant, against George J. Kuebler, defendant, for divorce, alimony and solicitor\u2019s fees. From an order committing the defendant for contempt for failing to comply with an order for allowance of suit money and solicitor\u2019s fees, defendant appeals.\nAbstract of the Decision.\n1. Divorce, \u00a7 121 \u2014when evidence sufficient to show ability of defendant to comply with order for allowance of suit money and, solicitor\u2019s fees. Where the court in committing a defendant for contempt in failing to comply with an order for allowance of suit money and solicitor\u2019s fees in a suit for divorce had before it the facts heretofore recited in the opinions of the Appellate Court sustaining such order and the original decree allowing alimony and solicitor\u2019s fees, held that the court was justified in finding against the defendant upon the question of his ability to comply with the terms of such order, notwithstanding his affidavit stating his income had been insufficient to meet his necessary office expenses, maintain his practice, and live respectably, and comply with the order.\n2. Divorce, \u00a7 118*\u2014when defendant is guilty of contempt in failing to comply with order for allowance of suit money and solicitor\u2019s fees. Where the defendant in a suit for divorce after having agreed upon the amount of alimony and solicitor\u2019s fees and having received the benefit of the decree had done all in his power to prevent the complainant in such suit from receiving the sums to which the court had decreed she was entitled, had transferred his real estate in question in such suit to his brother and assisted the latter in a suit against the complainant apparently for the purpose of so preventing her from receiving such sums, and for such purpose had prosecuted three appeals in such suit and presented records therein aggregating over 1,000 pages, held that there was no error in finding the defendant guilty of contempt in failing to comply with an order in such suit for allowance of suit money and solicitor\u2019s fees.\nAppeal from original decree as to alimony and solicitor\u2019s fees was decided in Kuebler v. Kuebler, Gen. No. 21,883, ante, p. 256, and the appeal from the order allowing suit money and solicitor\u2019s fees, in Kuebler v. Kuebler, Gen. No. 22,695, ante, p. 258.\nAlbert H. Fry, for appellant.\nCharles M. Haft, for appellee.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0259-01",
  "first_page_order": 285,
  "last_page_order": 286
}