{
  "id": 2947558,
  "name": "Charles A. Wahrer et al., copartners, trading as Wahrer Brothers, Appellants, v. Ciecilia Molloy, Appellee",
  "name_abbreviation": "Wahrer v. Molloy",
  "decision_date": "1917-03-12",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 22,725",
  "first_page": "329",
  "last_page": "330",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "204 Ill. App. 329"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 97,
    "char_count": 981,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.553,
    "sha256": "e327e3362c830da85fe921d610e2deff586d29ae7db49d42d0dc0888350c9a5f",
    "simhash": "1:54ee5124d42112dd",
    "word_count": 160
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:49:07.214052+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Charles A. Wahrer et al., copartners, trading as Wahrer Brothers, Appellants, v. Ciecilia Molloy, Appellee."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Dever\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Dever"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Kraft, Kraet & Erskine, for appellants.",
      "No appearance for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Charles A. Wahrer et al., copartners, trading as Wahrer Brothers, Appellants, v. Ciecilia Molloy, Appellee.\nGen. No. 22,725.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nAppeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. John Stelk, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1916.\nReversed and remanded.\nOpinion filed March 12, 1917.\nStatement of the Case.\nAction in replevin by Charles A. Wahrer et al., co-partners, trading as Wahrer Brothers, plaintiffs, against Ciecilia Molloy, defendant, for the recovery of a diamond ring, statement in trover being filed on non-recovery of the ring. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiffs appeal.\nAbstract of the Decision.\nEvidence, \u00a7 421*\u2014how value may be proved. Testimony as to the value of a diamond ring by a party not an expert nor in any way qualified to testify on the subject, held to be inadmissible.\nKraft, Kraet & Erskine, for appellants.\nNo appearance for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0329-01",
  "first_page_order": 355,
  "last_page_order": 356
}