{
  "id": 2945228,
  "name": "George J. Cooke Company, Appellee, v. E. R. Stege Brewery et al., in the matter of the intervening petition of Vincent D. Wyman et al., trading as Wyman, Jurgens & Carpenter, Appellants",
  "name_abbreviation": "George J. Cooke Co. v. E. R. Stege Brewery",
  "decision_date": "1917-03-20",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 22,119",
  "first_page": "371",
  "last_page": "371",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "204 Ill. App. 371"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 151,
    "char_count": 1704,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.566,
    "sha256": "d2a8bd096cdb24cce69455cb18b35c1c7c575bf34e6e568aa09e6844451eb4bc",
    "simhash": "1:4df69e05e86ee298",
    "word_count": 283
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:49:07.214052+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "George J. Cooke Company, Appellee, v. E. R. Stege Brewery et al., in the matter of the intervening petition of Vincent D. Wyman et al., trading as Wyman, Jurgens & Carpenter, Appellants."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Presiding Justice Barnes\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Presiding Justice Barnes"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Raymond T. Ellis and Ragnar Oberg, for appellants.",
      "Simeon Straus and Ira E. Straus, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "George J. Cooke Company, Appellee, v. E. R. Stege Brewery et al., in the matter of the intervening petition of Vincent D. Wyman et al., trading as Wyman, Jurgens & Carpenter, Appellants.\nGen. No. 22,119.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nAbstract of the Decision.\nParties, \u00a7 33 \u2014when petition for intervention by attorneys is properly dismissed. Where a firm of attorneys filed an intervening petition in a suit brought on a bill of interpleader to determine the right to a certain fund paid into court, claiming in such petition as assignee of the interest in said fund of one of the defendants to such suit after issue joined therein, and it appeared the petitioners were attorneys at law who had represented the assignor at a certain stage of the controversy and that one of them was his solicitor in such suit, held that the petition was properly dismissed in view of such circumstances.\nAppeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. Frederick A. Smith, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the March term, 1916.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed March 20, 1917.\nStatement of the Case.\nBill of interpleader by George J. Cooke Company, complainant, against E. B. Stege Brewery et al., defendants, to determine the right to a certain fund paid by complainant into court. From an order dismissing the intervening petition of Vincent D. Wyman et al., copartners, trading as Wyman, Jurgens & Carpenter, the interveners appeal.\nRaymond T. Ellis and Ragnar Oberg, for appellants.\nSimeon Straus and Ira E. Straus, for appellee.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0371-01",
  "first_page_order": 397,
  "last_page_order": 397
}