{
  "id": 2941890,
  "name": "Antonio Mennella, for use of Joe Mennella, Defendant in Error, v. Michael Bottigliero, Plaintiff in Error",
  "name_abbreviation": "Mennella ex rel. Mennella v. Bottigliero",
  "decision_date": "1917-03-20",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 22,117",
  "first_page": "403",
  "last_page": "404",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "204 Ill. App. 403"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "191 Ill. App. 574",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        5381778
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app/191/0574-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 104,
    "char_count": 1313,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.561,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.08593165084141971
    },
    "sha256": "6571ab272be75e5a7016e75f3347281e3cb4834c4928409a31a639fe4c23143a",
    "simhash": "1:0f73ca30582e9058",
    "word_count": 208
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:49:07.214052+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Antonio Mennella, for use of Joe Mennella, Defendant in Error, v. Michael Bottigliero, Plaintiff in Error."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice McDonald\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice McDonald"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Morgan & McFarland, for plaintiff in error.",
      "Blum & Blum, for defendant in error."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Antonio Mennella, for use of Joe Mennella, Defendant in Error, v. Michael Bottigliero, Plaintiff in Error.\nGen. No. 22,117.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nError to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Rufus F. Robinson, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the March term, 1916.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed March 20, 1917.\nStatement of the Case.\nAction in garnishment by Antonio Mennella, for use of Joe Mennella, plaintiff, against Michael Bottigliero, defendant, to recover a debt. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error.\nThe decision of the court on a former appeal appears in Mennella v. Bottigliero, 191 Ill. App. 574.\nMorgan & McFarland, for plaintiff in error.\nBlum & Blum, for defendant in error.\nAbstract of the Decision.\n1. Fraud, \u00a7 131 \u2014when evidence is sufficient to support instruction on. Evidence held sufficient to support an instruction on the question of fraud, in garnishment proceedings to recover a debt.\n2. Garnishment, \u00a7 100*\u2014when evidence is sufficient to sustain verdict for plaintiff. Evidence held sufficient to sustain a verdict for the plaintiff, in garnishment proceedings to recover a debt.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0403-01",
  "first_page_order": 429,
  "last_page_order": 430
}