{
  "id": 2948663,
  "name": "L. N. LaBouy and Jacob Wersching, copartners, trading as LaBouy & Wersching, Defendants in Error, v. August Marten and Marie Marten, Plaintiffs in Error",
  "name_abbreviation": "LaBouy v. Marten",
  "decision_date": "1917-03-20",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 22,133",
  "first_page": "404",
  "last_page": "405",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "204 Ill. App. 404"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 138,
    "char_count": 1521,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.543,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 6.770845263994211e-08,
      "percentile": 0.4131020766075551
    },
    "sha256": "91218299c30c1cb559fe67af2bb7974fcf359a5f5ed23a757575c2b2ab8530ac",
    "simhash": "1:dd0c5b0ed30786f8",
    "word_count": 238
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:49:07.214052+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "L. N. LaBouy and Jacob Wersching, copartners, trading as LaBouy & Wersching, Defendants in Error, v. August Marten and Marie Marten, Plaintiffs in Error."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice McDonald\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice McDonald"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "John V. Clinnin, for plaintiffs in error.",
      "Lyman, Adams & Bishop, for defendants in error; Spencer L. Adams, of counsel."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "L. N. LaBouy and Jacob Wersching, copartners, trading as LaBouy & Wersching, Defendants in Error, v. August Marten and Marie Marten, Plaintiffs in Error.\nGen. No. 22,133.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nError to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Patrick B. Flanagan, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the March term, 1916.\nReversed.\nOpinion filed March 20, 1917.\nStatement of the Case.\nAction by L. N. LaBouy and Jacob Wersching, partners, trading as LaBouy & Wersching, plaintiffs, against August Marten and Marie Marten, his wife, defendants, to recover commissions as real estate brokers arising out of a certain real estate transaction. From a judgment for plaintiffs, defendants bring error.\nJohn V. Clinnin, for plaintiffs in error.\nLyman, Adams & Bishop, for defendants in error; Spencer L. Adams, of counsel.\nAbstract of the Decision.\nBrokers, \u00a7 90 \u2014when evidence is insufficient to show procurement of purchaser. In an action to recover a real estate broker\u2019s commission, evidence 'held insufficient to show plaintiffs procured a purchaser for defendants\u2019 property who was ready, willing ai4 able to buy same, the prospective purchaser testifying that he was dependent upon another party furnishing the funds for such par-chase and there being no evidence as to such other party\u2019s ability or willingness to furnish such funds.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0404-01",
  "first_page_order": 430,
  "last_page_order": 431
}