{
  "id": 2947609,
  "name": "City Engineering Construction Company, Appellant, v. Frank Loeffler and William E. McCarthy, Appellees",
  "name_abbreviation": "City Engineering Construction Co. v. Loeffler",
  "decision_date": "1917-03-26",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 22,750",
  "first_page": "430",
  "last_page": "431",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "204 Ill. App. 430"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 131,
    "char_count": 1578,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.551,
    "sha256": "129ad273b681c0c01f64a47c1ec8cb6831994b91a19f69f3a54fd725079cafcf",
    "simhash": "1:139bdc01b40f39bc",
    "word_count": 249
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:49:07.214052+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "City Engineering Construction Company, Appellant, v. Frank Loeffler and William E. McCarthy, Appellees."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Presiding Justice McSurely\ndelivered the opinion of the court.\nAbstract of the Decision.\n1. Building and construction contracts, \u00a7 85 \u2014what is bar to recovery by contractor. Where the plaintiff by contract agreed to erect for the defendants certain buildings and to procure building loans therefor, held that his failure to procure such loans would be a bar to his recovery for a breach of the contract by the defendants.\n2. Building and construction contracts, \u00a7 103*\u2014when evidence is sufficient to show failure of contractor to procure loans. In an action by a contractor to recover for alleged breach of a building contract, evidence held sufficient to sustain the finding that plaintiff had failed to prove its readiness and ability to procure certain loans which it had contracted with defendants to procure.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Presiding Justice McSurely"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Walter H. Eckert, for appellant.",
      "F. F. Tollkuehn, for appellees."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "City Engineering Construction Company, Appellant, v. Frank Loeffler and William E. McCarthy, Appellees.\nGen. No. 22,750.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nAppeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. P. C. Walters, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1916.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed March 26, 1917.\nStatement of the Case.\nAction by City Engineering Construction Company, a corporation, plaintiff, against Frank Loeffler and William E. McCarthy, defendants, to recover damages for alleged breach of a building contract. From a judgment for defendants, plaintiff appeals.\nWalter H. Eckert, for appellant.\nF. F. Tollkuehn, for appellees.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0430-01",
  "first_page_order": 456,
  "last_page_order": 457
}