{
  "id": 2943598,
  "name": "Samuel Hecht, Appellee, v. Harry J. Goldberg and Jacob Stein, trading as Goldberg & Stein, Appellants",
  "name_abbreviation": "Hecht v. Goldberg",
  "decision_date": "1917-03-26",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 22,763",
  "first_page": "441",
  "last_page": "441",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "204 Ill. App. 441"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 144,
    "char_count": 1551,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.56,
    "sha256": "dd94f9822f6af9fdc48fa6f2d10da47476d3cf5c2acfcf5d83960a333974dc30",
    "simhash": "1:08bb9b31289f18fc",
    "word_count": 250
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:49:07.214052+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Samuel Hecht, Appellee, v. Harry J. Goldberg and Jacob Stein, trading as Goldberg & Stein, Appellants."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Presiding Justice McSurely\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Presiding Justice McSurely"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Walter F. Butler, for appellants; M. J. Sullivan, of counsel.",
      "Sattiel & Rossen, for appellee; Axel F. Lidman, of counsel."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Samuel Hecht, Appellee, v. Harry J. Goldberg and Jacob Stein, trading as Goldberg & Stein, Appellants.\nGen. No. 22,763.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nAbstract of the Decision.\n1. Municipal Court op Chicago, \u00a7 13 \u2014character of pleadings in fourth-class cases. Precision and exactness of statement in pleadings are not required in fourth-class cases under the Municipal Court Act.\n2. Master and servant, \u00a7 50*\u2014when evidence sufficient to show wrongful discharge. In an action to recover for services under a contract of employment, evidence held sufficient to warrant a finding that defendants employed plaintiff agreeing to pay him a certain salary per week and to keep him until after a certain date; that they discharged him prior to .that date, and that he was unemployed for five or- six weeks after his discharge and prior to said date.\nAppeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Arnold Heap, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1916.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed March 26, 1917.\nStatement of the Case.\nAction by Samuel Hecht, plaintiff, against Harry J. Goldberg and Jacob Stein, trading as Goldberg & Stein, defendants, to recover wages under a contract of employment. From a judgment for plaintiff for $105, defendants appeal.\nWalter F. Butler, for appellants; M. J. Sullivan, of counsel.\nSattiel & Rossen, for appellee; Axel F. Lidman, of counsel.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0441-01",
  "first_page_order": 467,
  "last_page_order": 467
}