{
  "id": 2951040,
  "name": "Nordyke & Marmon Company, Defendant in Error, v. A. H. Drysdale, Plaintiff in Error",
  "name_abbreviation": "Nordyke & Marmon Co. v. Drysdale",
  "decision_date": "1917-04-16",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "552",
  "last_page": "553",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "204 Ill. App. 552"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 134,
    "char_count": 1478,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.538,
    "sha256": "bdfce11a7e35f86a67551acf38c37259b46c1b2c431e07770b7f641b10a764f4",
    "simhash": "1:096a8f25788d228c",
    "word_count": 242
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:49:07.214052+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Nordyke & Marmon Company, Defendant in Error, v. A. H. Drysdale, Plaintiff in Error."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Presiding Justice Thompson\ndelivered the opinion of the court.\n<",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Presiding Justice Thompson"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Charles C. Le Forges, George W. Black and Thomas W. Samuels, for plaintiff in error.",
      "James S. Baldwin and W. J. Caret, for defendant in error; Weir, Ritter & Richards, of counsel."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Nordyke & Marmon Company, Defendant in Error, v. A. H. Drysdale, Plaintiff in Error.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nAbstract of the Decision.\nSales, \u00a7 320 \u2014what may not be subject of set-off in action for price of goods. In an action to recover for certain automobile parts sold and delivered, where the defendant was a seller of plaintiff\u2019s automobiles in a certain territory under a contract with a third party who was also a seller of plaintiff\u2019s automobiles in a certain district, including such territory, under a contract with the plaintiff, held that defendant would not be entitled to set off against plaintiff\u2019s claim a deposit made by him with such third party under his contract with the latter.\nError to the Circuit Court of Macon county; the Hon. William K. Whitfield, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1916.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed April 16, 1917.\nStatement of the Case.\nAction by Nordyke & Harmon Company, plaintiff, against A. H. Drysdale, defendant, to recover $131.80 for certain automobile parts shipped by plaintiff to defendant. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error.\nCharles C. Le Forges, George W. Black and Thomas W. Samuels, for plaintiff in error.\nJames S. Baldwin and W. J. Caret, for defendant in error; Weir, Ritter & Richards, of counsel.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0552-01",
  "first_page_order": 578,
  "last_page_order": 579
}