{
  "id": 2948284,
  "name": "S. O. Smith and T. H. Cherry, Trustees, Appellees, v. H. W. Knemoeller, Sheriff, Appellant",
  "name_abbreviation": "Smith v. Knemoeller",
  "decision_date": "1917-04-16",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "606",
  "last_page": "607",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "204 Ill. App. 606"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 156,
    "char_count": 1772,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.559,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 5.207966869300525e-08,
      "percentile": 0.32748762572644197
    },
    "sha256": "963358b99f5cdc674347f61672b87cd1ee3fc1830f4f70932f009398a3de63b3",
    "simhash": "1:101edba3312f71a0",
    "word_count": 296
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:49:07.214052+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "S. O. Smith and T. H. Cherry, Trustees, Appellees, v. H. W. Knemoeller, Sheriff, Appellant."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Presiding Justice Thompson\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Presiding Justice Thompson"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Truman A. Snell and Victor Hemphill, for appellant.",
      "Jesse Peebles, for appellees."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "S. O. Smith and T. H. Cherry, Trustees, Appellees, v. H. W. Knemoeller, Sheriff, Appellant.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nAppeal from the County Court of Macoupin county; the Hon. Andbew J. Duggan, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1916.\nReversed and remanded with directions.\nOpinion filed April 16, 1917.\nStatement of the Case.\nAction in replevin by S. 0. Smith and T. H. Cherry, trustees for the People\u2019s Bank of Girard, plaintiffs, against H. W. Knemoeller, sheriff, defendant, to recover certain horses and a heifer levied upon as the property of and taken from the possession of Fred Holtje, under an execution issued upon a judgment against him. From a judgment for plaintiffs, defendant appeals.\nAbstract of the Decision.\n1. Fraudulent conveyances, \u00a7 124 \u2014when retention of possession renders sale invalid. A sale of chattels, where possession remains with the vendor, is fraudulent per se and void as to creditors where the property is of such a nature that possession can be taken from the vendor and removed at the time of the sale.\n2. Fraudulent conveyances, \u00a7 3*\u2014what constitutes as to creditors. There is no difference in effect between a sale made with actual intent to defraud creditors and one fraudulent by operation of law.\n3. Fraudulent conveyances, \u00a7 3*\u2014when notice of sale not binding on creditors. Notice of a sale made with actual intent to defraud creditors or of one fraudulent by operation of law is only notice of an illegal transaction and not binding upon a creditor.\nTruman A. Snell and Victor Hemphill, for appellant.\nJesse Peebles, for appellees.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0606-01",
  "first_page_order": 632,
  "last_page_order": 633
}